rails-api released

snatchery · 4 months

Wow, thank you :) That was very nice of you.

snatchery · 4 months

It has no problems with asset pipeline, I assume?

kryptofiles · 4 months

Trying to use objects instead of strings as error messages so that when they are converted to json it is easy to extract data from them like min and max possible lenght. Json clients can build their own messages based on that and classic rails html views also can make a good use. It's way easier than simply parsing a string, isn't it ? How would your solution create <strong>count</strong> string? Would you build html in translations ? Would you send translation with html snippets to mobile phones?

kdubie · 6 months

https://gist.github.com/6db5c7620c677f666ba5 - My solution.

simdam · 6 months

http://version1.api.memegenerator.net/cache/instances/400x/10/10911/11173786.jpg

radarek · 9 months

But I guess that the server for storing objects is closed source (http://gemstone.com/products/gemstone) and there is no much use from maglev without the persistence feature.

paneq · 10 months

You can also read more about this topic in this responses: http://mlomnicki.com/programming/ruby/2011/07/20/class-vs-instance-methods.html http://andrzejonsoftware.blogspot.com/2011/07/yes-nick-class-methods-are-evil.html

snatchery · 10 months

It doesn't try to be too smart and reloads the whole app. The same way Rails does normally.

snatchery · 10 months

I wish I knew. I would create an issue in such case. I believe that I am pretty good at finding what's wrong and sometimes even fixing it (https://github.com/apotonick/apotomo/issues/28 - one of the weirdest bug that I hunted recently) but I couldn't track it down.

If rails-dev-boost works for some people and makes them happy and more productive then it is awesome and kudos for the creators which are probably much smarter than I am. It didn't work for me as well as it does for others so I created a very simple alternative solution. It does not change rails code reloading, does not try to make it faster, there is no voodoo. Only one simple change that makes huge difference and is not likely to cause any trouble.

snatchery · 10 months

lewy313 is my friend working on stopango.com . They also use this gem so it is likely that he upvoted my post because I told him about it.

snatchery · 10 months

Yes, currently it needs ruby1.9.2 but that will change.

snatchery · 10 months

It didn't work well for my app. The nice thing about active_reload is that it is very unlikely to break anything.

snatchery · 10 months

http://youtubedoubler.com/1fts - I think that spree was a good example app to pick up because everybody can try it for himself and it is big enough to make you see the difference and the benefits. Small rails apps don't need such things.

fobitz · 11 months

Make your live easier (in the future) and harder (now) and use 3.1 .

paneq

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login