TIL that the creators of the television show "South Park" were originally going to kill off the character Kyle in season 5 because he was too similar to Stan and they wanted to bring in Butters as a regular character.

Primetime22 · 2012-05-27T00:58:55.742831+00:00

ya but if anything Kyle''s dad was more involved in the show back in season 5. I don;t even know if we knew Randy was a geologist yet

chitwin · 2012-05-26T23:20:32.927590+00:00

Ya buddy moved to the great state when I was 16, so ya sorry if you can't handle a different point of view in your circle jerk. I think it's cute you had to go through my history. As for my comments on the sub, correcting lies doesn't count as talking points. I can't help the only news most people on this sub get is from the captimes and daily kos

shihtzuman8588 · 2012-05-26T23:16:05.482266+00:00

LOLLLL, you still didn't read the article you posted to did you. You said he was using tax payer money to defend himself in the John Doe, that's not true as proven by your first link. This link is calling a 100 Million dollar state investment in Milwaukee as some sort of campaign money.So I'm gonna ask whats your point?

Anomaly100 · 2012-05-26T23:05:07.126720+00:00

Honestly boooooooooosh the only Fast and Furious the people on r/wisconsin knows about is the Vin Diesel movie

shihtzuman8588 · 2012-05-26T23:02:39.398873+00:00

Did you actually read the article you linked to? He is using campaigns funds, which is leagl under the law. NOT taxpayer money.

chitwin · 2012-05-26T20:41:18.871025+00:00

I'm gonna do a magic/sword heavier on the magic, probably colleges first

shihtzuman8588 · 2012-05-26T19:59:33.855845+00:00

Please show me a source that says taxpayer money is defending him.

shihtzuman8588 · 2012-05-26T19:42:45.528585+00:00

When I look at the facts of the recall and the John Doe investigation there are a few things that I think about. The first is that they were never related until maybe a month the ago, that is really here nor there but it just makes it an insincere political talking point on Barrett's part, IMO. That being said, the fact that for 2 years this investigation has been going on and no charges have been or look to be filled against Walker. The reason he can't talk about it and shouldn't talk about is that it is an on going investigation, I don't know legally what he could say. But if you or anyone who is connected to you is ever being investigated by the DA I would advise talking about it as little as possible. Secondly as has been reported before the veterans scandal was brought to Walker's attention he then had his office inform the DA, so they could start an investigation. so ya like I said they both stuck to there talking points well, I just don't think either one really did anything special, only the people that have made up their mind at this point watched the debate for more than a few minutes

shihtzuman8588 · 2012-05-26T17:49:40.814893+00:00

lol, all Barrett could talk about was the John Doe investigation. I wouldn't say he beat Walker on anything, they both more or less just stayed on their talking points

nerdybynight · 2012-05-26T16:59:19.260260+00:00

I would shorten the starters in favor of an extra bench spot. RB WR TE, RB/WR, TE/WR. Just a thought with 16 teams, not sure how I feel about the extra drafts but hey try it out. I would also go IDP, with as many teams as you want it will just add another way for people to win.

robert32907 · 2012-05-26T15:36:47.818053+00:00

this is a pretty interesting story, I've been reading bits and pieces about it. I wonder where this is going to go.

hahnsolocup · 2012-05-26T15:29:48.812206+00:00

Locally here in Wisconsin Mark Belling is always a good time. Nationally Red Eye is just a good time, otherwise I perfer to read ace. otherwise like others have said Levin is always pretty spot on, he strongest when it comes to the law (being a lawyer probably helps on that). Steven Crowder on youtube is pretty funny as well

LibsrPus · 2012-05-26T15:24:44.329985+00:00

You know I have no problem with some liberals on here, just because we disagree on the solution doesn't mean we don't both see the problem. But the ones that come just to push circular arguments, and call us all birthers and racists are really starting to piss me off, I get enough of that in r/wisconsin

Mr_Fuji · 2012-05-26T15:21:20.790506+00:00

Both are sticking to their talking points very well. I sometimes wish we could have more personal debates, let the candidates talk to each other an actually maybe sound like real human beings. I've always thought I would love to go into politics and fix things, but I could never keep mu big mouth shut long enough to get elected

th3byrdm4n · 2012-05-26T15:15:42.570477+00:00

Funny enough, that steel company survived far longer after the Bain money was invested. Than it would have otherwise. While when OUR money was invested it Solyndra it lasted maybe, maybe 12 months longer than it would have otherwise. Lot's to question Romney on, I don;t really think Bain is one of them

chitwin · 2012-05-26T14:48:19.325916+00:00

wow sidebar pic, awesome.

pabstish · 2012-05-26T14:36:55.053704+00:00

you know plus the fact that he has stepped up DEA raids of state sanctioned growers, but you know he has to wait just like everything else

Ballgrounded · 1 day

luke should be Emo kid

Ballgrounded · 1 day

replace with Bobba,, tough guy

DistortedGuest · 1 day

it's funny the only thing they rate false is that these are the final numbers, not the actual numbers themselves

OINTMENTS · 1 day

I actually love monotone Lovie, why give anything away. I know we as fans want to know more but come on, I don't want to see him have a Denny Green moment

bigbearclaw85 · 1 day

I would say 4 years 12-16 mil guaranteed, 23-30 overall, plus maube some incentives

LaziestManAlive · 1 day

it's his face I want to punch it too

chitwin

TROPHY CASE

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login