Sebatinsky

- friends
188 link karma
1,382 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Three-Year Club

    Verified Email

Is there underlying physiology to the "thousand-yard stare," or is it a cultural phenomenon rather than a medical one? by MrBoundin askscience

[–]Sebatinsky 1 point2 points ago

You should elaborate on this "thousand-yard stare." I'm not sure what it means.

$100 MFA Starter Kit VI: 80 degrees at 8 o'clock edition by jdbeein malefashionadvice

[–]Sebatinsky 3 points4 points ago

It's the number of inches that the shorts extend downward from the inseam. In other words, it's how long the shorts are; 10" shorts are longer than 8" shorts.

IWTL the basics about liquor. by Senor_Ragerin IWantToLearn

[–]Sebatinsky 1 point2 points ago

Thank you both.

IWTL the basics about liquor. by Senor_Ragerin IWantToLearn

[–]Sebatinsky 3 points4 points ago

Well, it's not all liquor, but r/scotch seems like a vibrant community. They link to this whisky FAQ in their sidebar.

Edit: modified link based on comments below.

Historians of Reddit, what is your favorite weapon in your area of study? by RandomCaucasianin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 1 point2 points ago

Yep. Every fencing master mentioned in that scene is real, although their teachings don't really interact in the way that the scene implies.

I guess we can imagine that they were utilizing some sort of 17th century gentleman's MMA? It could be a forerunner to this stuff.

Historians of Reddit, what is your favorite weapon in your area of study? by RandomCaucasianin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 2 points3 points ago

All kinds of clever responses in this thread. I feel like a boring Bob for picking a sword and a knife.

Historians of Reddit, what is your favorite weapon in your area of study? by RandomCaucasianin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 4 points5 points ago

This comment can be appropriated for a lot of historical locations and periods, I think. Good call.

Historians of Reddit, what is your favorite weapon in your area of study? by RandomCaucasianin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 25 points26 points ago

The rapier is a really interesting weapon. It evolved from the standard single-handed swords common in Italy in the 1500s. The rapier symbolizes a shift in both culture and combat systems: it was an essentially civilian weapon -- something unusual in the context of its creation.

The fencing system that went with the weapon was transformed from one with dozens of colorful guards like "guard of the unicorn" and "iron door" to one with only 4 guard positions. This was part of the shifts in intellectual thought taking place in Europe at the time. Members of the gentry like Camillo Agrippa remade the conceptual framework for fencing in geometric and philosophical terms.

The rapier also played a big role in the duel, which was a custom that evolved (primarily) out of the vendetta in Italy -- yeah, the Montague and Capulet thing. This one-on-one combat among social elites caught on in the rest of Europe, and eventually became most associated with the French. That might have something to do with the fact that the French were much better at killing each other in duels, while the Italians had a tendency to spend a lot of time arguing about the question of honor in pamphlets. A good place to learn more about this part of the story is The Duel: Its Rise and Fall in Early Modern France, by François Billacois.

_

Another interesting weapon is the navaja. This knife was associated with Andalusian criminals in the early 1800s. Many navajas have a ratcheting locking mechanism that makes a pretty loud CLICK-CK-CK-CK noise when opened. There has been some reasonable speculation that the reaction to this sound on the streets of 19th century Spain would be fairly similar to the sort of reaction you might observe when a shotgun is cocked today.

How did Kings rise to power? by pretzelzetzelin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 0 points1 point ago

That's fair, but I don't see why anyone with knowledge of either situation (the origins of monarchy or the origins of a specific monarchical political system) couldn't elucidate a bit. I'm all for fine-tuning questions but OP seems to be so in the dark that either response would be an interesting addition.

Actually, I too would be interested in hearing from anyone willing to chime in. I know very little about this sort of thing... I don't think the English restoration after the civil war really counts.

EDIT: Some people have piped up since I last looked. Reading those comments now.

How did Kings rise to power? by pretzelzetzelin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 5 points6 points ago

This isn't a lazy question. He wants to understand how monarchical political systems came into existence. It is a broad question, but I'm sure that one specific example of the birth of a monarchy would go a long way toward answering it.

Four questions about the Vietnam war. (Homework help) by potato11teenin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 4 points5 points ago

Here is a sheet with some Vietnam war vocabulary. At least one of these terms will help you with your homework.

IWTL to read faster by ALLiDOisRAVEin IWantToLearn

[–]Sebatinsky -1 points0 points ago

Read as much as you can in your free time. Probably the best stuff to read is non-lit fiction, where the words are only there to convey information (what I like to call "newspaper writing"). Within that, read whatever stuff you enjoy most. Don't worry about getting faster... it's not going to happen anytime soon. However, if you take this advice and reading like a fiend becomes a habit, you should see noticeable reading speed improvement within a couple of years.

First day at my new internship. Thoughts? by Jayrossin malefashionadvice

[–]Sebatinsky 0 points1 point ago

Very nice! I hadn't heard of them, but I will be buying a couple of belts in the near future...

Did the west become less accepting of the vilifying of ethnic groups in the subsequent decades due to the terrible consequences of this in Nazi Germany? by Trevjin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 2 points3 points ago

Well, some "they" did, but some "they" didn't. For instance, eugenics was actually fairly popular in the US until Nazi Germany gave it such a bad name.

When did people start brushing their teeth? by boywithhatin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 0 points1 point ago

I agree. I didn't downvote you, but I figured you deserved a response. I'm pretty my response explains most of the downvotes you got. When possible, it's probably good to provide either a link or a reference to a book or article, though.

Help in finding a subject of study from the 17-18th century by Medzain AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 2 points3 points ago

As a student in the UK, a topic worth considering might be the English Civil War (or Puritan Revolution, depending on who you ask). King Charles lost his head in 1649 and Oliver Cromwell was basically in charge until 1658 (the year of his death). Then comes the restoration and then the Glorious Revolution of 1688 which set England on a path to the balance of powers it now enjoys.

There are a number of interesting threads you could explore from approximately 1600 (maybe 1603 for the death of Elizabeth?) to about 1700. If you have an interest, I'd be happy to chat a little bit and help you sort out what you want to do, and maybe point you toward some good sources.

Help in finding a subject of study from the 17-18th century by Medzain AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 0 points1 point ago

Well, it's not graduate work, so I'm going to guess secondary sources.

When did people start brushing their teeth? by boywithhatin AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 0 points1 point ago

I cannot find why the source is wrong...

The problem is that you provided no source, no explanation of the proposed phenomenon, and it isn't common knowledge. None of this is to say that you're wrong, but you didn't move the conversation forward for anyone else.

Also, for all intents and purposes.

Fighting with swords, in formation – how was it done? by BlueResonancein AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 4 points5 points ago

Something that hasn't been addressed here is that swords were not a weapon of first resort for most armies for most of the history of Europe. Some specialist or mercenary groups were very fond of them (Landsknechte), but much more common were spears or pikes.

This is speculation, but I would hazard that spears were more common because they were much cheaper to create en masse, while also offering a reach advantage over swords.

What are r/AskHistorian's favorite journal articles? by ankhx100in AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 0 points1 point ago

It is! That is at the very beginning of the paper, and gives a preview of the kind of personal, descriptive approach the author will take in the article.

What are r/AskHistorian's favorite journal articles? by ankhx100in AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 3 points4 points ago

Not actually history, but Geertz's Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight is probably my favorite journal article.

What do you guys think of Eric Hobsbawm? by GregsonLestradein AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 2 points3 points ago

Interesting to hear what most of AH knows him for. To me, he stands as an early proponent of what has become the thriving sub-field of social history and a scholar who played an important role in the formulation of the 17th century crisis concept -- a concept that is still being investigated today (albeit with a different focus).

When did the ability to read become commonplace? by puppeteer107in AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 4 points5 points ago

Like many other factors, literacy was often a sign of social class. In that way, it played a role in securing and maintaining power for social elites.

Obviously this is a broad generalization, and the relationship between literacy and class varied temporally and geographically. However, it is unreasonable to claim that a person associating literacy with the wielding of class-based power is just "politically motivated."

When did the ability to read become commonplace? by puppeteer107in AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 2 points3 points ago

You make a great point about the connection between religion and literacy. The Protestant reformation (starting early in the 16th century) removed a great deal of the hierarchical organization from the church lives of many Europeans, though this effect was mitigated somewhat in England, where the reformation played out somewhat differently than on the continent.

Still, for English-language readers, you'll be familiar with the King James bible. Still considered by some people (though not academic theologians) the definitive English-language bible, it was commissioned by James I in 1604. It was the third English translation of the bible, and one of a huge swath of vernacular translations across Europe.

Because the Protestant viewpoint allowed for/encouraged individual reading of scripture, these vernacular bibles became widely printed and read.

When did the ability to read become commonplace? by puppeteer107in AskHistorians

[–]Sebatinsky 5 points6 points ago

In England, literacy rates exploded starting in the second half of the 16th century. By this time literacy was already the norm for members of the gentry and nobility.

Around this time the distribution of pamphlets for entertainment and political activism was taking hold. Theater was also becoming very popular with common people, and broadsheets were posted to inform people of entertainment events. Shakespeare's great success went hand-in-hand with this growth in common literacy. You can also see a huge increase in the number of surviving pamphlets from 17th century London over those from the 16th century.

One caveat is that this growth of literacy was much weaker among common people in rural areas.

view more: next