this post was submitted on
842 points (62% like it)
2,170 up votes 1,328 down votes
top 200 commentsshow all 473

[–]Tweakedenigma 448 points449 points ago

We often ask people of faith to stand up to the crazies they claim to be nothing like. So thanks for doing so.

[–]lowasser 308 points309 points ago

As an atheist, I occasionally downvote atheists who are being douches.

[–]surells 325 points326 points ago

I downvote anyone who is being a douche bag.

[–]16bitgamer 56 points57 points ago

You have much to teach us.

[–]IAmBroom 37 points38 points ago

Just don't get all "holier than thou".

[–]cannables420 15 points16 points ago

oh dont gimme tht "holy" crap!

[–]OneWarning13 25 points26 points ago

There are good people and bad people and douches with and without religion, and it is a grave mistake to get into an "us and them" mentality. Religion is only a small part of a person and certainly not the part you should judge them by.

[–]aeyuth 3 points4 points ago

true story: I asked a christian guy "how much of your day to day actions are infuenced by your faith?"

50%

yea, right.

[–]chilehead 12 points13 points ago

I tend to downvote anyone I see being a douche, regardless of their religious views. Both douche and downvote start with the same letter for a reason, right?

[–]ProjectMeat 7 points8 points ago

Both start with a d! Therefore, God. Checkmate, atheists!

[–]DFractalH 6 points7 points ago

My first name starts with a D ... :(

[–]dlove67 0 points1 point ago

Mine too :( But to be fair, I /am/ kind of a douche.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

downotes should be used for people who do not contribute to the discussion. It shoul not be used to censor messages you do not like, whether it is because of their content or manner.

[–]CaptainObviousMC 29 points30 points ago

I'm not sure taking a blind shot at them on an atheist board is really what I mean when I say that.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 94 points95 points ago

I am talking a specific group of people, they know who they are. If you are a theist and you talk well and don't down vote everything to hell. Then awesome.

Its the down voters who do it blindly I am frustrated with. (In short I am not bashing all theists)

[–]Direnaar 33 points34 points ago

I applaud your comment, but do you think it will make them change?

[–]OTJ 17 points18 points ago

it would be relevant to watch "storm" by tim minchin.

[–]0xbdf -1 points0 points ago

[–]blackberrydoughnuts 0 points1 point ago

Did anyone else have a huge crush on Storm from that poem? I really wanted the narrator to do her.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 38 points39 points ago

Good question.

[–]Zeag 4 points5 points ago

To me this feels very much like blind fanboy wars on metacritic. People who give straight tens to all exclusives of their console and zeros to all exclusives of the other console.

In other words, even if they stop, others will take their place... It's a never-ending cycle.

[–]Intolerance 9 points10 points ago

Theists? change their mind? not likely

[–]SMCinPDX 10 points11 points ago

Hey! That's not very tolera- . . . ah, I see what you did there.

[–]Keljhan 1 point2 points ago

We'll find out, won't we?

[–]CenisPancer 1 point2 points ago

Not exactly sure how we could ever possibly find out..

[–]Tweakedenigma 4 points5 points ago

It is more than most do. So I think it deserving a little credit.

[–]Matthews_huh 23 points24 points ago

Yeah, I think theists should realize that labels such as Christian or Catholic carry such a variety of definitions that the labels are nearly meaningless.

Are you the catholic that hates homosexuality, or disproves of birth control? Maybe the catholic that chooses scientific explanation over ID, maybe the opposite. Perhaps you're more liberal, maybe you don't believe in hell, just heaven. Maybe you believe in separation of church and state, or maybe you think the world is in a moral decline and only jesus' teachings can bring salvation. Maybe you pray to saints, maybe you don't.

Which of the 300 Baskin Robbins flavors of Catholic are you? These vague identifiers are no longer sufficient in the modern religious climate, and only serve to group yourself in with the confusing mass of fundamentalist and political ideologies that are all warring for public space.

I apologize for the rant, but saying you're a catholic could mean anything from giving a homeless man your shoes to condoning pedophilia. If you're genuinely interested in helping open lines of communication, i think it's important to avoid ambiguities. Specificity matters.

[–]FredSchwartz 16 points17 points ago

Is this not true of any label? Liberal? Republican? Football fan?

Atheist?

There are those here who have well-reasoned arguments for why they claim the label "atheist", and those who are mindlessly parroting an uninformed atheist-because-it-makes-me-smarter-than-dumb-theists dogma, and plenty others in between and out the sides.

[–]Teuthex 18 points19 points ago

No, 'atheist' simply means 'lacking belief in god'. People are welcome to differ in every other way. This isn't the case for 'Christian' or 'Catholic', they're touted as comprehensive worldviews, with only some being 'real' depending on who's talking.

[–]Diazigy 15 points16 points ago

To be fair, there are different "types" of atheists.

There are atheists who yell at people on the street for believing in God.

There are atheists who grew up religious, who then later rejected religious upbringing.

There are atheists who were never religious.

There are atheists who have never even heard of God.

They all share a common belief and all reject one kind of dogma, but there are different "types" of atheists.

[–]Teuthex 11 points12 points ago

Yes, but none of those things make one lack belief in god any more or any less. They are not types of atheists, they are atheists that do other things as well.

[–]A_Prattling_Gimp 1 point2 points ago*

I think what Teuthex is getting it is this. Atheism has no holy book, it has no moral code because it is morally neutral. On the flipside theists do have holy books that suggest a moral framework that you're supposed to adhere to.

A Christian may hate gay people, the reason for this is because he will find justification for it in the Bible. Any Christian that argues against his stance on homosexuals is also informed by the same book, in which he will find his own justification for why Christian A is wrong. The Bible is the root of both these people's morality and informs how they act..

If an atheist hates gay people it is based of some other aspect of his personality. There is no canon of vague, open verses in the atheist holy book that say you must hate gays because there is no holy book! An athieist is less likely to hate gay people because there is no empirical reason to do so.

As Teuthex said 'atheist' simply means 'lacking a belief in God'. From there anything is game. You can be an atheist Buddhist if you want. You can believe in reincarnation providing it isn't mediated by a God (for obvious reasons), which is what Jains believe (a true religion of peace by the way).

Conversely, all most theists have a complex, codifed belief structure in the form of holy books that lay down the groundwork for their beliefs, and by extension, who they are.

[–]Amalleigh 2 points3 points ago

Actually, you can be a theist and have no complex codifed belief structure, nor any sort of holy book, Pagans do it every day.

[–]Snarfleez 0 points1 point ago

I couldn't help but read this with a Dr. Seuss-type rhythm.

[–]B00dle -1 points0 points ago

There are also the atheists who accept people have a different perspective, do not try to change an other persons mind. Personally, I do not have a problem with religion, as long as they are not causing anyone or any animal harm, and not trying to change other peoples minds, then let them go in peace.

[–]FredSchwartz 0 points1 point ago*

Not so. Many people subscribe to the Humpty Dumptian view that "a word means what I mean it means", and ascribe labels to themselves without checking first to see if that's what everybody else thinks it means or by trying to alter its meaning to what they want. I subscribe to the Montoyan view that "You keep using that word; I don't think it means what you think it means."

In other words, just because somebody calls themselves <x>, doesn't make them <x>. I can't make myself a duck with pure wordplay.

[–]Matthews_huh 3 points4 points ago

This is a good point. However, the difference between sports communities and religious communities is that teenagers never kill themselves because their parents tell them that being a Jets fan is immoral. Science teachers are never forced to teach that watching the cowboys play will explain the secrets of the universe.

With politicians, their policies can be examined and debated. I have heard of few politicians that say, "My foreign policy is the one true foreign policy!!". If a Democratic president says that Republicans aren't allowed to marry, we can recognize how absurd that is, and that that is unjustifiable intolerance.

Atheism currently does not promote bigotry nor hide its presence, where as, we've seen that broad religious labels can mask all manner of hate and moral deficiency. And religious ideals are not only shaping our country, but the world.

We have had presidential candidate's that believe the world is six thousand years old and that states should be able to make using condoms a crime!

Beliefs should be scrutinized proportionately to how they affect the populace.

If the label of Atheist one day promotes inequality, bigotry, and anti-scientific thought, then it should be scrutinized by whatever group emerges that prefers free-thought to dogmatism.

[–]sillyhatday 0 points1 point ago

Being a jets fan is moral bankruptcy

[–]FredSchwartz 0 points1 point ago

"Atheism currently does not promote bigotry nor hide its presence, where as, we've seen that broad religious labels can mask all manner of hate and moral deficiency."

Are you making the first claim because, as some here are claiming, that Atheism is a null and neutral state that makes no judgements - and therefore does not judge religion to be an inferior state? In that case, you're clearly separating Atheists from Atheism. Secondly, I think that your second claim may be a contradiction of the first, rendering the overal statement self-contradictory and inconsistent.

[–]palparepa 35 points36 points ago

We welcome any attacks. Just substantiate them and reply to our questions.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 16 points17 points ago

Exactly.

[–]Dudesan 11 points12 points ago

In fact, it is the worst way.

I'd say it's one of the worst ways, but probably not the absolute worst way. The Evangelical tactic of screaming "Your lives are empty without Jesussss!" and threatening to send people to hell? I get the feeling that's worse than doing nothing at all.

Still, it's nice to see someone promoting open debate. Have an upvote.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 12 points13 points ago

Truth. I was raging a bit.

[–]dlove67 0 points1 point ago

Well, just doing those things aren't very damaging to atheists at all.

[–]deathcapt 25 points26 points ago

Post this IRL, at your church.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 18 points19 points ago

Sure.

[–]docsquidly 29 points30 points ago

It can be frustrating, but such is the nature of any truly open forum on the internet.

Also, it doesn't have to be theist lurkers down voting. It could be militant agnostics down voting anything that would suggest that you could know anything one way other other.

It would take a bit of work and access to data about who down voted what and interpreting past comments to determine the beliefs of those individuals. I could be done, but would take a lot of effort.

[–]Supermoves3000 21 points22 points ago

Agreed... I doubt the religious people are really the issue. I think it's more likely the "I'm not even religious but I can't stand r/atheism!" faction. From my observations, they're by far the most vocal and numerous critics of this subreddit. Just about any time an r/atheism post gets to the front page, you get a thread of comments that goes:

"What a pathetic circlejerk."

"THIS. x1000"

"Word. I'm not even religious but I can't fucking stand fucking atheists."

[–]Cyralea 3 points4 points ago

I think the operative word there is 'vocal'. I doubt there are really so many of them, but they do kick up and scream the loudest and work in droves to mass-downvote. Ironically enough, while I don't dislike theists I most certainly do dislike those apatheists. They make discussion very difficult in here.

[–]toddriffic 2 points3 points ago

Agnostic/Apatheist here, I think that's a bit unfair. I rather enjoy some of the posts that get called out for being offensive. Where else is there for such a thing? What I don't like is the excuse that being a jerk to a theist (in person) is ok because of all the harm religion has done in the past. When I suggest that this isn't OK I get downvoted and the thread ends there...

Is my position THAT unreasonable?

[–]Cyralea 1 point2 points ago

It's more that it does harm to atheism, as a movement (for those of us who care) when someone tries to stifle a dissenting voice. I liken it to when black people were told to stop complaining about their "so-called rights". Rosa Parks was being all kinds of offensive to the gentle white people of the day. Can you imagine anything more frustrating?

Unfortunately, we're at a stage where we're trying to establish ourselves as a legitimate group, and a lot of people are interested in suppressing that. This usually happens in the form a smear campaign, and the religious right is very good at it. To be apathetic about it allows them to "win" the PR battle, making it difficult for a lot of future atheists. You may not care, but it does affect a lot of us.

Granted, I can appreciate that your experiences aren't the same as some others on Reddit, and that you might not understand the anger and the mockery that's sometimes present.

[–]toddriffic 1 point2 points ago

Oh I see... I think you misused the term "apatheist" then. It doesn't mean we're apathetic to social issues involving theism, etc., rather it's apathetic to the question of belief.

we're trying to establish ourselves as a legitimate group

This is correct. But you shouldn't brush off criticism of the methods for doing so as apathy. While it may be fun to joke about the dumb things theists say, it's really not helping the cause that (we both agree) is so important IMO.

Just so you know: I care deeply about one day my kids being able to publicly call themselves Atheist without the negative connotations surrounding the term. But I also believe that some of the more crude sentiments I find in r/atheism does more to confirm that notion rather than change it.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 7 points8 points ago

Maybe thats true. Maybe there is a worse group out there. However.

My issue is though the theists. I want them to be able to express their ideas instead of being tools.

[–]HarryMcDowell 8 points9 points ago

Good luck with that; most people are nothing more than tools, regardless of whether they believe in a god(s) or not.

[–]sculptedpixels 1 point2 points ago

I doubt the religious people are really the issue. I think it's more likely the "I'm not even religious but I can't stand r/atheism!" faction.

I always got the feeling that those were the religious people. They'll deny it, but if you consistently lambaste every strong atheist statement made, chant circlejerk like you should be in one, imho, the vast majority of those folks are theist trolls.

[–]zBriGuy 6 points7 points ago

militant agnostics

Who knew that was a thing?

[–]iamdestroyerofworlds 11 points12 points ago

"WHO IS THE ONE AND ONLY GOD?!"

aims a pistol at the face and pulls the hammer

"I... I... I don't know!"

lowers pistol

"Damn right you don't..."

[–]Kai_Daigoji 1 point2 points ago

I don't know why this cracked me up so much.

[–]UnicornsBeforeJesus 0 points1 point ago

militant agnostics

Well played.

[–]prezuiwf 28 points29 points ago

I am a Catholic and actually upvote a lot of stuff on r/atheism, but I also downvote stuff if I feel it's poorly conceived, unnecessarily mean, or otherwise disagreeable from an objective perspective (i.e. I won't downvote something just because it's anti-religious). I think that's a pretty fair standard and I don't feel I have to take to the comments and justify every time I downvote a picture of a guy haranguing a Christian on Facebook who posted a Bible verse.

[–]xXSanityXx 6 points7 points ago

Curious what you would deem unnecessarily mean?

[–]i_toss_salad 2 points3 points ago

Ad hominem arguments.

[–]frogandbanjo 2 points3 points ago

The first time I see a Facebook conversation posted to /r/atheism where the person posting the Bible quote also writes something like "hey I read this the other day and thought it sounded pretty" or "I've been thinking about this and don't have any good answers; does anybody have any thoughts about this?" and then gets "harangued," I'll be sure to downvote it.

So far, I have not seen a single one of those. What I have seen are throngs of people using a Biblical quote to simultaneously advertise an idea or belief that they hold, and the (usually sole) reason that they hold it - and I'm being downright reckless with the word "reason". To top it off, those beliefs are, by and large, absolutely ridiculous, and/or hateful.

Do you know what sane, polite people do when they have a belief or opinion that they do not want to actually discuss? They keep it to themselves.

[–]breadrising 16 points17 points ago

While there are theist lurkers who downvote things, I have a feeling a good portion of Reddit itself, regardless of their beliefs, downvotes things on /r/atheism for the hell of it. Simply because "Lol /r/atheism is such a circle jerk; so stupid LOL."

Little do they know that this place means a helluva lot to many of us, especially those who don't have any atheist communities where they live and are still somewhat in the closet about it.

But for little reason, the idea of this subreddit being a circle jerk has been rampant. That gives me an idea. I think I'm going to go over to /r/gaming and downvote them for posting things about video games! ...bunch of circle jerkers...

[–]GeneticAlgorithm 9 points10 points ago

This irritates me to no end. /r/atheism speaking about atheism? What the fuck? Next you're gonna tell me that they talk about skyrim in /r/skyrim. Or /r/windows talking about windows. Such circlejerks!

[–]Cyralea 2 points3 points ago

The circlejerk comment is certainly inane. Of course, inanity is often the last recourse of a group looking to dismiss another without substantiating any arguments. It's an ad hominem, nothing more.

[–]natholin 3 points4 points ago

ahh.. but if they are lurkers how do you KNOW they are there? And how do you know they are down voting? hhhmmmm????

[–]xX_Nois[S] 19 points20 points ago

when I post an extremely long response with "Catholic Here:" And I immediately receive upvotes. And the person who responded with a clear well thought out and respectful reply immediately receives down votes. Someone is backing me up unfairly and downvoting unfairly. I don't like that.

[–]crossZERO 3 points4 points ago

Upvoted for reason

[–]360walkaway 4 points5 points ago

Isn't it kind of redundant to put a slash before "endrant"?

[–]GeneticAlgorithm 6 points7 points ago

endrant;

[–]xX_Nois[S] 0 points1 point ago

Thanks guy

[–]xX_Nois[S] 3 points4 points ago

I just don't even know what I am doing I think

http://darkdiamond.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/118099731169.jpg

[–]Icarusjam 5 points6 points ago

I am a theist who has never downvoted any /r/atheism post...you can call me...Good guy theist

[–]e-jammer 4 points5 points ago

As a Christian I love to read /atheism as its the only place I can find intelligent open minded discussions on religion. Also I only enjoy spending time with open minded people who love to help their fellow man, and I really don't find many people who allegedly believe in my faith who do so.

[–]Umber_Hulk 13 points14 points ago

Wouldn't be kind, loving, and level headed Christians if they didn't.

However, a +1 for you.

[–]grundledorff 3 points4 points ago

Well said, Parker.

[–]Chimicherrychangas 7 points8 points ago

Somebody finally said it! Thank you! It's like walking into a shop just to say how terrible all the products are. Also, this is a really brave thing to do seeing as you're a theist.

[–]JanisIsBetter 7 points8 points ago

OP is my real life friend. I've been watching him respond on this thread since the start of his shift at work today. He looked defeated when he was like how am I supposed to prove that I'm a Catholic? I just saw him again as he's leaving on his dinner break and he looks even more defeated because you guys are calling him a homophobe. I'm an atheist and he's a Catholic. We work together and have random thought provoking conversations about the bible, beliefs, and science. Keep it classy reddit. Not every Catholic is a homophobic unreasonable stuck up prick.

[–]BebopPatrol 3 points4 points ago

I've read through his responses as well, and he's definitely a homophobe.

[–]JanisIsBetter 1 point2 points ago

As his supervisor, he treats homosexuals with respect and like everyone else. We work with about 1/4 of a 30 student staff who is openly gay, lesbian, bi, or transexual. He's a good guy who helps EVERYONE out by covering their shifts, lending a hand when anyone needs help, and jokes around with us about what college kids like to joke around about (teachers, classes, work, current events, the government, TV Shows, video games).

[–]eendeebo 7 points8 points ago

I do not give two shits about downvote trolls. Honestly, anyone who is so hurt and offended by downvotes really needs to take a look at why they're participating in discussions. "WHY AM I BEING DOWNVOTED/ LOL SRY I DON'T KNO Y PPL R DOWNVOTING U" comments are a waste of energy.

If people don't like what you've said or the way you've said it, maybe think a bit more about what you're saying as well as how and where you're saying it instead of getting angry at a mob of neckbeards. And/ or graduate from high school.

[–]MikeTheInfidel 2 points3 points ago

Good opinions and thoughts can be effectively silenced through downvoting, so it can be perfectly reasonable to get upset about it.

[–]eendeebo -1 points0 points ago

I agree that the point of downvoting can be subverted by trolls, but as far as being effectively silenced, that's bullshit.

If you have a real point, and you state it well and in the correct place, it's unlikely you'll be downvoted to hell. Theists who have relevant things to say re: some of the discussions in /atheism, for instance, might be "effectively silenced" here, but they wouldn't be on /debatereligion...that is, if they actually have something useful to say.

The people who are truly upset over downvotes are either reddit babbys or high school students who ought to stick to facebook for their "debates."

[–]LogicalThought 3 points4 points ago

bravo good sir...bravo

[–]xX_Nois[S] 1 point2 points ago

Thanks boss

[–]Zombiislayer 2 points3 points ago

A Christian here, and I want to say that while I still don't entirely agree with everything that the Catholic church believes in, I would like to say thanks on the behalf of all the other people of faiths who go on Reddit. Believing in faith doesn't mean that you can't believe in science. Personally, if someone comes up to me and says "Evolution is a lie," I'm more likely to hit them over the head with "The Origin of Species" than "The Holy Bible". So thank you. I can tell you that not all people of faith are crazy (except maybe Southern Baptists) (Joking) (Kinda), and that we enjoy it when one sane human stands up in the group of black and white and stay "I'M NOT A STEREOTYPE!"

So thank you.

[–]invisiblewar 3 points4 points ago

Im Catholic, so can I put in my two cents?

I got my bachelors in biology and a masters in biomedical sciences. I know a bit more than most about science. I really don’t care for the whole Evolution vs. Creationism argument. It shouldn’t be an argument against God vs. Evolution. I don’t see the two as rivals, like the Yankees and Red Sox or Axis vs. Allies. They arent opposites in my opinion.

Let me just say before I go on here that Im 100% firm in my beliefs. Without evolution life would not be sustainable. It’s just a matter of fact. We pass traits down and sometimes a mutation occurs that helps our species survive. This to me has nothing to do with being an atheist or theist. I could argue that the ability for us to adapt to changes so we can survive is an attribute to creationism and an intelligent design. It’s almost like how cars can be programmed to adapt to driving conditions. I mean, he’s supposed to be an all knowing omniscient being, so why wouldn’t he make life on this planet dynamic. This is how I view it.

I must say that I get ashamed with Christian behavior myself. It does get embarassing to hear that someone cannot be friends with someone because of their beliefs. I am disappointed to see others being so judgemental and condemning others for opposing views. It’s shameful how uneducated some are with religion and yes I’m referring to the theist side.

Isn’t it human nature to attack something that is unfamiliar to us? We’re a very stubborn species what can I say. I may not be in any position to say this but I want to apologize on behalf of all those that have been attacked by a Christian and for all the ignorant statements that have been said by us.
Sorry if this is a bit long, I tried to organize my thoughts a bit while writing it but Im currently studying for an Embryology, Histology and Anatomy test I have on Monday. Some of it may be a bit scatterbrained though.

[–]dlove67 0 points1 point ago

Not trolling or attacking, but this:

Let me just say before I go on here that Im 100% firm in my beliefs.

is another problem atheists tend to have with religious folk(at least, I do, and I've heard it said many times before)

[–]emote_control 2 points3 points ago

The joke is, really, that we understand their faith perfectly well. If they were paying attention instead of blindly raging, they might notice that.

[–]ThiswishIwish 2 points3 points ago

Can't beat them with superposition and make belief ? Downvote them! That will show those heathens! Watch as their self esteem is crushed by the arrow of blue then swoop in and teach them the glory of the MOST high GOD and how only he can elevate!

[–]King_of_Ticks 9 points10 points ago*

People get downvoted for tons of different reasons. I mean look at the latest cat picture and notice the downvotes. Why the hell would anyone downvote a cat picture?

[–]Direnaar 12 points13 points ago

automatic algorithm downvoting to prevent a ridiculous upvote count.

[–]King_of_Ticks 17 points18 points ago

I am pretty new to reddit. I just thought 1/3 of redditors were jaded dicks

[–]Direnaar 7 points8 points ago

Can't say you're not right on that last part :)

[–]Supermoves3000 4 points5 points ago

Only jaded dicks would downvote cat pictures.

[–]OTJ 4 points5 points ago

i wish i had a gif of a cock cast in jade stone.

[–]Supermoves3000 11 points12 points ago

[–]dlove67 0 points1 point ago

That's a jpg. He clearly asked for a gif

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

I downvote every cat picture.

[–]HarryMcDowell 0 points1 point ago

Why is this a good thing?

[–]Direnaar 4 points5 points ago

Because then you'd have posts with 20000 upvotes eclipsing the frontpage for weeks.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 4 points5 points ago

Fucking reddit. How does it work?

[–]Sucka27 4 points5 points ago

[–]herpbert_derpinger 2 points3 points ago

Why the hell would anyone downvote a cat picture?

Different people like different things. I, for example, just unsubscribed from r/aww just so my front page doesn't flood with the things.

[–]Keljhan 1 point2 points ago

It wont help. Try /r/pics if you really want to change it.

[–]TheJakeRockz 3 points4 points ago

Thank you. Thank you very much. You're awesome. I love you.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 2 points3 points ago

Thanks for the support

[–]SaintBio 3 points4 points ago

"misconstruing your faith."

This is my biggest problem as an Atheist. Most of the time I have no idea what religious people actually believe. If I call them on literally anything suspect in their religions they immediately say something along the lines of "well, that's not what I believe" or "some people think that but not me." Please, if you don't want me to misconstrue your faith, tell me what your faith consists in.

[–]brehon1104 5 points6 points ago

i like how people say they are religious, then only decide to believe certain pieces of their religion.

To me, this is COMPLETELY nonsensical. If your religion is so divine, how do you justify only believing some of it, or twisting it and coming up with your own interpretations?

[–]Cyralea 2 points3 points ago

Cafeteria Christian.

Hmm, I feel like having some Corinthians today. Last night's Leviticus didn't sit well with me

[–]Deathshead488 1 point2 points ago

Because that is a large part of the religious system ,because reading scripture then interpreting what it means to YOU is whats its all about,its not twisting anything, if you read a book by an author but interpret the meaning differently then he/she had intended are you twisting the meaning of the book or simply looking at through your own eyes.i take what i believe to be good from my religion and leave whats seems to do no good.i never state that my religion is divine and without fault so i can't speak on that point.

[–]Cyralea 2 points3 points ago

There are as many Christianities as there are Christians.

[–]raresilk8 5 points6 points ago

Thanks, OP.

I really don't understand the "theist lurker" mentality. I have absolutely zero desire to go lurk or downvote in /r/christianity or wherever else you folks hang out. I don't know or care what you're doing or saying in there. Yet despite the fact that theists know we disagree with them, and that many people here have a lot of anger for how they've been treated by theists, instead of doing something constructive about it (like OP, for example) they just come over here, get butthurt, downvote everything and go home to whine they're persecuted.

[–]TimeRunsOut 3 points4 points ago

I deeply respect people like you.

[–]EmpireStijx 0 points1 point ago

Not going to lie, I'd love to be challenged on my beliefs frequently (Atheist). People get angry when we challenge the religious, but not vice versa, so if we get challenged a lot, that gives us room to try and preach some reason!

[–]dh1977 2 points3 points ago

I'm not trying to paint theists with a broad brush, but I think they are much more sensitive to having someone challenge their thinking than atheists are. Or, speaking as an atheist with theist friends, that's how it seems. In other words, if theists want to come on r/atheism spouting whatever...I'm not really inclined to give a shit. In that scenario, the impact on my life is nil. Whereas many believers on the other hand, if an atheist were to come to their clubhouse railing about how there's no god, would probably take it a lot more personally. That's one of the nice things about being an atheist; if someone takes a swing at my (lack of) faith, I don't really have some spiritual duty to defend it.

[–]greentangent 0 points1 point ago

That's right, be a True Scotsman!

[–]Sloady 0 points1 point ago

Theists on r/atheism. It's the highest form of masochism.

[–]legendaryderp 2 points3 points ago

I suggest everyone save this thread, and repost it every time we have that particular suspicion.

[–]Olemcsnipey 2 points3 points ago

Catholic to Atheist hug? Shit's about to happen.

[–]quiz96 2 points3 points ago

...

I don't really care, but if you're going to downvote, please try to downvote everything to keep it fair.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]xX_Nois[S] -1 points0 points ago

I can dig that. Don't judge. I am not supposed to either. I mentioned it a few times. I got gay family. I love them. What they do with their body is their business. If they want religion. I will tell them how I see a virtuous life should be lived.

[–]praisecarcinoma 2 points3 points ago

It also goes against a main tenant of proper reddiquette. You don't down vote something just because you don't like it. You downvote it because it's not relevant to the subreddit, or the post, and/or contributes nothing. If you don't like it, don't vote on it at all.

[–]MusicMissionary 2 points3 points ago

Doesn't bother me. I think any Christian who comes here, no matter how belligerent, must have questions or doubts. The more angry, the more doubtful. If something I say about a Christian's faith makes him mad enough to downvote me, I figure he's going to be thinking about it that much harder. It's how Christians eventually turn into atheists. If they only talk to others who agree with them and are never challenged about anything, they can never change or evolve.

[–]hittingal 0 points1 point ago

A lot of the theists that come on and downvote stuff are just all like "Hey, I disagree with your stuff, and I'm not going to read it and just go ahead and downvote anything."

No means to offend theists who aren't doing it.

Keywords are 'a lot'.

[–]godless_savage 2 points3 points ago

The one thing I dig about Catholics is the pomp and circumstance. I've been playing D&D for a while and enjoy the cleric class. Its fun to see Catholics doing their bit and pretending its to some Lawful Neutral god with the Healing, Law, War and Protection domain.

ok, I'm stoned. Anyways. Kudos.

[–]xX_Nois[S] 2 points3 points ago

Your stoned? Kudos

[–]MendedSlinky 0 points1 point ago

Mormon here, the only things I downvote here is false information. For example, the idea that mormons believe that "blacks were less faithful in the pre-existence". That is not LDS doctrine. However few individual mormons do believe this, it is not actually official doctrine. So anytime I see bogus claims such as that I leave a comment with the correct information and downvote the parent comment.

[–]sammwwise 3 points4 points ago

Thanks for not turning r/atheism into a punching bag. I respect your respect.

[–]I_JERK_CIRCLES 4 points5 points ago

Thank you op, you're doing the lords work.

[–]Zergmaster 1 point2 points ago

thank you im pretty shure you saying this means more to them than it whould ever mean coming from us

[–]xX_Nois[S] 2 points3 points ago

I would like to think so.

[–]huff-themagicdragon 0 points1 point ago

Good on you.

[–]Ilajnatap 1 point2 points ago

If Atheists wanna prove they are morally superior to Theists then they have to be accepting to others whether they share common beliefs or not.

[–]raresilk8 4 points5 points ago

I don't want to or have to prove anything to theists. Nor would I try. As the old saying goes, using reason on those who abhor it is like administering medicine to a dead man.

[–]Cyralea 4 points5 points ago

Moral superiority does not come from blind acceptance of bad ideas, no matter how nice that sounds. I don't have to be accepting of child rapists for that very reason.

[–]malinterian 4 points5 points ago

Most of us are. It would be nice to get that same acceptance back though. Do unto others etc.etc.

[–]malinterian 1 point2 points ago*

Agree completely. Like I've said before, I don't go into their subforums and criticise or denigrate their beliefs. That's what this forum is for. If they don't like it they don't have to read it.

Edit: If any theists do want to argue their beliefs why not go to r/debatereligion instead?

[–]TeCuervo 1 point2 points ago

I have to say that I actually believe that someone, anyone, mentioning "misconstruing your faith" is a local favorite.

[–]pubestash[!] 0 points1 point ago

I'm fine with theists coming here and running amok. There are a lot of atheists who post on /Christianity, and I know I've down-voted posts/comments there that I found ridiculous. I can't hold a double standard and ask them to not down-vote comments here that they strongly disagree with.

[–]RickRay1 0 points1 point ago

Do you notice that when you go to 'debatereligion' there are very few theists that have much of an argument or answer for a logical question?

[–]spy_fox 1 point2 points ago

I don't consider myself to be purely atheist. I believe in something, but I can't define it. I believe in a god, but not in any one religious description of a god.

[–]Zrk2 0 points1 point ago

But if you do it to RAEG comics you do it with my approval.

[–]Ed_Tivrusky_IV -1 points0 points ago

The same goes for atheists though. Just because I don't believe what you do, I'm not going to say you're wrong. As long as you're not pushing it on me, do what you like.

OP: Thanks for making this point.

[–]the-slowpoke-pack 1 point2 points ago

Kudos boss.

Its nice to hear of a logical Theist sticking up for alternative beliefs

[–]BoomboxHero 1 point2 points ago

As far as I know, we don't go into r/christianity and downvote stuff. At least, I don't.

[–]nedstupidflanders -1 points0 points ago

Whats with the tea pot?

[–]lillylover9 1 point2 points ago

Catholic here as well, it drives me crazy when I see us religious folk being close minded about the beliefs or lack there of, of others. It gives the (sort of) religious people like me a bad rep.

But, just know that there are people out there (like me) that are genuinely interested, and deeply respect the opinions shared on this board. I may not necessarily agree with you, but I do like to lurk and read what you have to say. :)

[–]rerumnovarum 1 point2 points ago

Huiusmodi causae secreto pontificio subiectae sunt.

[–]Nannerpussu 0 points1 point ago

We should have a message like this for atheists too. I can't remember all the posts that were downvoted just because they were posted by religious people. Downvotes are for posts that don't contribute to discussions, ffs.

[–]rascilon 0 points1 point ago

This may be downvoted, but I am atheist myself, and have on occasion downvoted some posts on /r/atheism because they come across as so hateful and bitter. Basically if I take the word Christian, or Theist and replace it with another word like, gay, woman or black for example and if it sounds completely bigoted and cruel, I downvote it.

I get that a lot of people were essentially abused by theists at some point or another. I understand the impulse to have some sort of cathartic revenge, but such passionate hatred when reactive like this, gives the atheist community a wounded and hateful appearance.

[–]teamhex 1 point2 points ago

"It is irresponsible of theists to come on r/atheism and down vote and attack people here."

True, it's always irresponsible to start a fight you can't win.

[–]GlitterRainbow 0 points1 point ago

I didn't know theist lurker downvoting was was that big of a problem.

[–]waydat 0 points1 point ago

This downs like an even Gayer Version of West Side Story..both sides with so much free time to get all catty....

[–]onelasttime 1 point2 points ago

Theists have every right to exercise their downvoting powers here, within reddiquette.

[–]m15terp1nk 0 points1 point ago

I believe the monseingor is starting to get the point...

[–]1123581321345589144b 1 point2 points ago

I was a christian for years, there is no "misconstruing" of faith here.

[–]Managor 0 points1 point ago

Upvoted for reason

[–]chowder138 0 points1 point ago

It's understandable that some of us would do that. But people are entitled to their own beliefs, no matter whether they believe them to be wrong or not.

FYI, i'm Christian as well.

[–]cheesesaurous 0 points1 point ago

I know right, all our posts would be making the front page if it wasn't for those thousands of meddling theists and their dog!

[–]Conky_ 0 points1 point ago

Meh does it matter? Were just proving our point if they continue to blindly disapprove of something they don't understand.

[–]that_one_christian 0 points1 point ago

i down vote every odd number on the front page when i am on it because God told me evens were better.

[–]Balltron9000 0 points1 point ago

This post has exactly 666 points right now. Nobody vote!!!

[–]SquidJiggin 0 points1 point ago

This is the first religious post I've up voted in months, atheist or theist. Good on you sir

[–]ThatCrazyViking 0 points1 point ago

NO ONE DOWN VOTE THIS ANY MORE! 666!

Carry on.

[–]MrJAPoe 0 points1 point ago

I love that people can be open-minded. As long as people are rational and not thumping the good book, we atheists could get along very well with all other theists

[–]id1176 0 points1 point ago

I want to start by saying. I love your post. May much more karma be thrust upon you. Okay now to the point. Yeah it's a little wordy.

So many down votes for such a nice little rant. WTH is wrong with people. You know I say let 'em be hateful. It not only makes them look stupid but makes mankind look stupid when we try to argue. I'm all for a good debate but when you just slander people out of pure hate than you need to get a life. I as neither an atheist nor theist think this whole bull shit battle has gone on long enough. Okay I'm not gonna lie I torment both sides when I can. But it's only to open their minds. I know so many people who say they know everything because of God. But the same of the opposite as well. To many atheists think they are incredibly knowledgeable about everything as well. But I say if you don't think about it and question everything then how do you progress? You have to question everything you have ever been taught or thought. Otherwise you get stuck in a downward spiral of bull shit. Okay that is all good bye

[–]ajsmithjr -1 points0 points ago

the fact that they downvote means they are breaking God's golden rule... do onto others as you would have them do onto you. that means they are mistreating God's word and are going to hell

[–]entopan 0 points1 point ago

Thanks for this. There is this ongoing post from last night, he keeps replying and I keep getting sucked back in. It's all "woe is me" bull, I don't try to offend, but he keeps being offended. Oh well. Be happy fellow human!

[–]iheartrms 0 points1 point ago

My first thought on reading something like this is "Isn't it a sin to attack people and cause trouble in a forum?" but then I remember that these people always have some way to rationalize it such that God or Jesus or the Virgin Mary or whatever would want them to do it and make it not a sin. :(

[–]u8a22 0 points1 point ago

what is a thiest lurker

[–]redhonkey34 0 points1 point ago

We would be hypocrites for not accepting a good debate on this topic. I mean we as atheists are the minority so we have to argue for our beliefs.

[–]Guardian_Of_Pigs 0 points1 point ago

Well played sir, well played.

[–]ILikeNegativeKarma 0 points1 point ago*

I'm not a theist lurker, but you can downvote anyone for any reason. Sometimes I downvote people just because they only have one point. I downvoted you for taking karma too seriously.

[–]ValthePixie 1 point2 points ago

I would imagine most athiests do the same as me, only upvote. I rarely down vote, it would have to be totally inaccurate. If I don't like an article I don't down vote it. Only people who are really childish would do so.

[–]Stillings 1 point2 points ago

Atheist here: The same can be said for atheists! Read before judging posts, etc. C:

[–]throwawaynumber4 1 point2 points ago

I do not understand how anyone can continue to participate in an organization that knowingly harbored child molesters.

[–]MCampion 0 points1 point ago

This post reminds me of a guy I knew in college. He really was a smart guy in most respects (got a masters degree in engineering at a top 10 engineering university), but he was also a fundamentalist christian. And in general he was very nice, but he told me one day that whenever he saw a poster on campus he disagreed with he would rip it down. It astounded me that someone who was that smart, and was generally a very nice guy would do something so inconsiderate and backwards to the way a difference of opinion should be approached.

/endrant

[–]Lotenn -1 points0 points ago

As a man who has been convinced of a greater intelligence or controlling force in the universe but whole heatedly trusts science. I support this post.

[–]majinosity 0 points1 point ago

Theist lurker: This guy is not a real catholic! He is an atheist! BURN THE WITCH!

[–]jtfine 0 points1 point ago

Whatever, we can take it.

[–]effinmike12 0 points1 point ago

Well thank you. Have an upvote. I personally think there are good people in almost every group, even if I do think that their beliefs are complete nonsense. Many of us were brought up in religion, and I don't think we were nuts. Well not all of us.

[–]PD_SaltyWaffles 0 points1 point ago

Atheist or Theist, being an asshole or troll deserves a reprimand (or worse, depending on the circumstances). One of my good friends is quite religious, but I KNOW that he's a great guy and somewhat open minded (and very willing to consider new ideas). I also know an atheist who's not the kindest person or open-minded person in the world.

[–]k_mahre 0 points1 point ago

I am an uncatholic... and by that I mean I am an atheist who was once a Catholic. I also have great respect for both the oppressive Catholic religion, and also my gay neighbors... WTF am I supposed to do when I respect someone for their life and still am told to hate them for an elementary school reason?

[–]Moebiuzz 1 point2 points ago

As an unlabeled person, I got much more theist after argueing with a close minded atheist who asked questions on my beliefs but didn't care for the answers.

[–]indorri 0 points1 point ago

<3