this post was submitted on
510 points (71% like it)
861 up votes 351 down votes
top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]moonflower 220 points221 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

i have never understood why Jesus had to die to ''save'' anyone from his own judgement and punishment

[–]phreaklegion 70 points71 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It doesn't really fit with the modern world view, even that of Christians, and how we think about "sacrifice". In the ancient world, the gods required sacrifices and they were fixed "prices". In a way it would be an analog to shopping at a chain store. The price is simply the price, it doesn't matter how much money you have. If your god demands you sacrifice a sheep, it doesn't matter if you have only one sheep or a thousand, the sheep is the sacrifice. We don't think about "sacrifice" in the same way, we think about it as relative - the guy who has only one sheep is making a bigger sacrifice than the guy with a thousand.

[–]toobias 44 points45 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The bible makes that relative point, too, though. In the parable in which the poor woman gives the only few coins she has, the rich man gives way more but not anywhere near his entire fortune.

[–]ColdSnickersBar 70 points71 points ago* 

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, but the story of Cain and Abel has the opposite moral: it didn't matter that Cain was a farmer and that his offering of his finest crops was a heartfelt gift out of love; Abel's sacrifice was accepted and Cain's was rejected, even though Cain didn't even have any lambs.

Personally, though, I think Genesis actually comes from oral cautionary tales from a mix of Assyrian, Mesopotamian, and Hebrew legends, and really describes the coming of early civilization. I think the story of Adam and Eve was probably from various legends about early civilization granting knowledge of good and evil, but also conscience of sin, such as how animals and protohumans have no knowledge of good or evil and so they don't "sin". I think "Cain and Abel" evolved from a stories about the birth of agrarian empires, the subsequent abuse and genocide of nomadic herder tribes, and how agrarian empires brought money and the ownership of land and people, and how that created the motives for war and murder.

[–]ctrlaltninja 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I always thought of Adam and Eve as a metaphor for growing up.

You're safe in your parents care and home, their "garden", you're learning to talk and call animals and other things by their names, you don't care if you're running around naked, then you hit puberty and start to find out things about the world and good vs. bad.

Women mature faster than men so of course Eve started it. Throw in a little bit of misogynistic wording and Eve tempted Adam.. into puberty. Women have periods and then have the ability to give birth once they hit that age, and men work to provide for them. At the same time they go off and live on their own, outside the safety of their parents.. and they could never return because you can't go back to your childhood and that safety and innocence.. until you've died and reached the death or the "promised land".

[–]RobotBuddha 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I always thought of Adam and Eve as a metaphor for growing up.

And that's why metaphors suck. They can mean whatever the hell you want. They're so vague in inherent meaning that they might a mad lib.

[–]vinceums 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I always thought of it as a metaphor for religion in general. They were in paradise with their ignorance, but as soon as they tasted from the tree of knowledge, they were banished. So as long as you don't KNOW that there's no such thing as god, and believe in it, you can be blissfully ignorant. But once you KNOW it's all BS, oops. No Soup For You.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]zynthalay 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Link?

[–]toobias 24 points25 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sure, all of that complicated stuff, or God just "breathed" it into the writer's mind. Occam's Razor, dude. /sarcasm

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]reddeth 27 points28 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]exegesisClique 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem) - William of Ockham

Not bad for a 14th century Monk.

[–]pimpbot 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Indeed.

This, plus natural selection are IMO two of the most profound insights that human beings have ever articulated.

[–]SicSemperHumanus 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is why I love reddit. Very well done my good sir tips his hat.

[–]Veylis 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Any link to that chart not inside the motivational template?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

For the Christian branches, here are several charts.

[–]Im-postle-able 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think you'll find Zeus did it. Ha take that Judeo Christian!

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's been a while, but doesn't the Bible say his sacrifice is rejected because of his attitude?

[–]OneTripleZero 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No, it's rejected because it doesn't "please the lord", as it was only plants and grain. No real reason is given, other than he just didn't like it. Check Gen 4:3-5.

[–]balls_in_da_mouf 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The bible I read stats that abel's sacrifice came from the best of his flock but cain took his share first and what was leftover gave as a sacrifice to his lord. I think it was the king james (yes i know) but that was a long time ago...

[–]ColdSnickersBar 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No, it doesn't. Thinking at first that you may have been on to something, I did a quick check. It just says he grew crops and Abel raised sheep, and that Cain offered some of what he had and Abel offered some of what he had. God liked one and not the other. It doesn't say why.

[–]pornomfg 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You don't make friends with salad!

[–]El_Corrector 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Upvote for obscure, yet awesome, "Simpson's" ref.

[–]Palatyibeast 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That may be the best use of that quote, ever, in the history of mankind. And I'm counting the episode you took it from.

[–]ejp1082 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Genesis was certainly derived from earlier Babylonian legends, which in turn were likely oral traditions that pre-date written records.

Carl Sagan, writing about the evolution of human intelligence in The Dragons of Eden, finds the garden of Eden myth to be a fairly strong metaphor. So there might be something to what you're saying - the myth might have some foundation in the experiences of the earliest people and the founding of civilization.

[–]wyo 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Former theologian and seminarian here, and this is the interpretation I endorse, and even saw expounded fairly significantly by (liberal) theists in school. The basic notion is that the "people" in the Bible are allegories and metaphors for entire tribes, races, or groups, and the stories actually tell of the historical relations between those entire peoples and the Hebrews. From the Hebrew perspective. For a Hebrew audience.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]ColdSnickersBar 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm sure. The Jews came from a melting pot of cultures. Even the OT itself describes the Jews worshiping Egyptian gods.

[–]notcaptainkirk 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm not defending the Bible here, but the New Testament is what is supposed to be the basis of modern day Christianity.

[–]Undertoad 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

"For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."

--Matthew 5:17-18. Jesus explains that the Old T. still applies.

[–]rub3s 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Also kind of explains the age of the earth being 6,000 years. 6,000 bc is about the time agrarian soceity really started to coalesce for the first time in Sumer.

[–]withnailandI 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So in that sense Christianity moved humanity forward a bit. No longer do the fickle Gods require sacrifices of a goat or a hecatomb of oxen at every turn. Now, you have one God who has already accepted the sacrifice, his son, and you can repent and move on with your life. Kind of a one-stop shopping. (And then make the leap to no gods at all.)

[–]rub3s 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That had to be a selling point. No more wasting resources in sacrifices.

[–]vcastorini 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And that there were no more "chosen people." It didn't matter if you were not born a Hebrew, the Christian God only cared that you believe. It's much easier to believe than to change the culture you're from. Also, mix in apocalypse cults that were all the rage in the Mediterranean and, BAM!, you've got one fast moving religious expansion!

[–]ThePantsParty 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think everyone understands that, but the OP was talking about the fact that this wasn't a price he demanded of his followers, but rather a price he was charging himself to stop his own judgement. The point is that since he's setting the price that he himself is going to pay, he could have made it anything he wanted and it would have been just as effective.

It's basically like there's a gunman holding a group of hostages, and he tells them "I either have to kill all of you, or I can be merciful and decide to cut my own arm off instead." Then he stands there in front of them and hacks his arms off in front of them, and then acts like it was somehow a demonstration of selfless generosity that they all should be grateful for. The reality is, no, he created the situation himself, gave himself the two choices, and then chose to mutilate himself. Since the entire situation was manufactured however, he could have made the punishment that he had to eat a bag of Skittles for all that it mattered, or he could have just walked away. It's really all on him, and looks more like mental illness than generosity.

[–]kirkleton 31 points32 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think it went something like this...

"PUNY HUMANS, YOUR INSIGNIFICANT GOAT SACRIFICES BORE ME. YOUR VAPID AND PETTY ATTEMPTS TO PLEASE MY IMMEASURABLE STANDARDS HAVE WORN MY INFINITE PATIENCE PAPER THIN. MY INSTRUCTIONS FOR PLEASING ME ARE CRYSTAL CLEAR IN THE MANUAL I HAVE SHREWDLY PROVIDED FOR YOUR SPECIES... WHAT? WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT'S AMBIGUOUS? THAT'S IT! IF YOU WANT SOMETHING DONE RIGHT, YOU HAVE TO DO IT YOURSELF! PREPARE YOUR FINITE MINDS FOR WHAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS AN THE MOST COURAGEOUS ACT EVER CONCEIVED. I WILL SACRIFICE THE GREATEST THING POSSIBLE... MYSELF!

...pauses for gasps...

DO NOT BE ALARMED, FEEBLE HOMINID! IT WILL ONLY BE MY SON, WHO IS ALSO ME, IN YOUR DREARY HUMAN FORM, BUT HE'S MAGICAL, I MEAN, I'LL BE MAGICAL, BUT HE'S MY ONLY SON, BUT IS ALSO ME, GOT IT?

SO, WHEN I SEND MY SON, ER, WHEN I DESCEND TO YOUR DISGRACEFUL PLANET, I EXPECT YOU TO RECEIVE ME THE ONLY WAY YOU KNOW HOW... BY NAILING ME, I MEAN, MY SON TO TWO LENGTHS OF LUMBER!

I SHALL DIE AND REMAIN DEAD FOR NOT 2, NOT 4, BUT 3 EARTH DAYS! NO MORE, NO LESS. I WILL THEN RISE AGAIN AND SHALL WALK AROUND FOR SHORT WHILE, ONLY TO FLY BACK UP TO HEAVEN, WHICH IS IN SPACE, TO MEET ME AGAIN, OR WHATEVER, I'M NOT REALLY SURE HOW THE WHOLE, CREATING A DOPPELGANGER THING WORKS... SO MY SON (ME), AND I WILL HANG OUT FOR ETERNITY WAITING FOR OTHER HUMANS TO BELIEVE THIS STORY SO THEY CAN GET IN TO HEAVEN, OR I SHALL SEND THEM TO BE WITH THAT PRICK WHO TRIED TO BE LIKE ME... I'M UNIQUE! NO ONE CAN BE LIKE ME!.. ANYWAYS, I THINK THERE IS ANOTHER VERSION OF ME IN SOME SPIRIT FORM FLYING AROUND SOMEWHERE, THIS SHIT'S GETTING CONFUSING."

-God

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Read it in Morbo's voice.

[–]martincles 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I already did.

[–]HastyToweling 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Wow. That was great.

[–]slomo68 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]fotorobot 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

god sacrifices himself to himself to save humanity from himself. what part of that doesn't make sense to you?

[–]OneTripleZero 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I liked the part where it sounded like it made sense, but it didn't.

[–]Dawggoneit 25 points26 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It was a moment of clarity where he realized what a judgmental asshole he had been, and that the only way to keep himself from judging and punishing people further was to kill himself, so he did.

Then he realized how much fun being an asshole was, so he was all like "JAYKAY!," and came back as an emotionally needy teenager, and invented a new way to judge people: those who think he's really cool for killing himself, and those who don't care.

[–]ClemsonPoker 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So he was goth, but came back as emo.

Slight downgrade.

[–]vjmurphy 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

More like a lateral move.

[–]rub3s 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Furthermore, who the fuck is the Holy Ghost?
How did a third party get involved?

[–]bstaff1901 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's not important, what is important is that he died so that we don't have to be held accountable for our actions.

[–]rub3s 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He had conversations with his father (God).
Did Jesus have some kind of split personatliy disorder?

[–]TouchedByAnAnvil 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Jewish biblical heroes (David, Moses, Joshua etc) all kicked arse and killed infidels using the power of God. The messiah the Jews were expecting was supposed to be a superman, who would kick the invaders out of their country.

But Jesus was easily captured and killed. How does that reconcile with him being the messiah, and having the entire power of God at his disposal? Easy - just say that he intended to die all along.

This is why "sacrificing himself to himself to change his own decisions" is so ludicrous. It was the best they could do to reconcile the facts with what the messiah was supposed to be.

If God is all loving, he should not cause unnecessary suffering. So why did God need the blood sacrifice of Jesus? Why not just declare sins forgiven? He must therefore be not all loving or not all powerful. Or perhaps just blood thirsty.

If you read through Leviticus God seems to love animal sacrifices. If he's enternal and unchanging he must surely still find the smell of burning meat and the stench of death pleasing.

[–]LordCrap 64 points65 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"If we're all God's children, what's so special about Jesus?" - Jimmy Carr

[–]DiamondFalcon 49 points50 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Jews are like biological children, Christians are like adopted children, and Jesus is a clone.

[–]SupaFurry 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

“Mommy is one of the chosen people, and Daddy believes Jesus is Magic” - The Delightful Ms. Silverman

[–]assface 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I would disagree with your conjecture that she is delightful...

[–]SupaFurry 8 points9 points ago* 

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Check the batteries in your sarcasm detector...

[–]RobotBuddha 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Which, amusingly enough, is how she met god in an episode of her show. And then had sex with him.

Ok, it was when she had to buy batteries for her remote control. But still.

[–]sedaak 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

According to Christians, he actually was God. So he put himself in a body and killed himself so he could... go home.

[–]SergeiGolos 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Screw you guys, i am going home.

[–]sedaak 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think it was more like. OW OW OW OW, fine ill leave

[–]peanuttoast 32 points33 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't even get the concept of a "son". Did god procreate? OK, god sent "a version" of himself down - why is this a son?

Anyway back on topic- I think this is why Catholics focus on "The Passion" of the christ. It wasn't just that he died, it's the bloody ass-kicking he received which they emphasize (that's why so many people LOVED Mel Gibson's drawn-out snuff film).

But, i think you're right. This emphasis on the suffering before the death is to compensate for the theological contradiction that you point out.

[–]palparepa 20 points21 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Someone should make a movie called "The Passion of a random Inquisition's victim."

[–]zdkm 36 points37 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In a wooorld
Where people are dying to be Catholic
One Man must fight...
Fire with Fire

Michael Bay's Auto-da-Fé
SUMMER 2011

[–]reddisaurus 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If God is omnipotent, why would he only have one son?

[–]zip_000 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A similar question that always bugged me when I was still on the fence on atheism...

God is supposed to be perfect, but how can something that is perfect - truly perfect - ever do anything wrong? If he can't do anything wrong, how can he make man imperfect?

[–]gluino 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Some christians respond to this by saying god made humans able to choose to sin or not. And the carrot&stick rules are laid down by him similar to parenting.

[–]zip_000 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, I've heard that argument, but I don't think it really answers the core issue of how can imperfection come from perfection.

I think the problem really is that absolute perfection cannot actually happen. It almost seems like that if it did occur, then it would be like an Ice-9 situation where everything it touches would become perfected...hold on, I can see religious people taking that and running with it...forget I said anything.

[–]hyperkinetic 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

how can something that is perfect - truly perfect - ever do anything wrong?

Entropy?

[–]ttread 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Did god procreate?

I always wondered why God has a gender, which is characteristic of sexual reproduction. Does he have a penis? If so, what does he do with it? Does God have a female partner?

[–]xinu 17 points18 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Does he have a penis? If so, what does he do with it?

probably jack off to r/gonewild like the rest of us

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So God jacks off to images of his own children? What a pervert!

[–]xinu 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

yeah, but it's god so it's nonsexual and silly

[–]RobotBuddha 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So that's why Joseph wasn't more freaked out by it!

[–]SergeiGolos 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And the priests are doing Gods work molesting children.

[–]sedaak 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Maybe that was his point. Anyway the concept of perversion is just another societal convention. The idea of applying a societal convention to a heavenly being is more preposterous than the idea of their being a heavenly being.

[–]TenThousandSuns 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Does god have a bellybutton?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The Christian church is to be God's "wife" in heaven. No, I'm not shitting you.

[–]kouhoutek 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Many religions have the concept of an avatar...gods are too alien and awesome for mere humans to handle, so they instill part of their divine essence into a human to be his intercessor. The resulting demi-god is still a part of the original god, but has a less alien, less awesome existance as well, one that humans can handle.

[–]hyperkinetic 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Please ignore the man behind the curtain!

[–]Dazureus 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I guess god procreated with Mary the way Zeus procreated with Alcmene, Hercules' mother. The only difference is that Hercules became a demigod and Jesus is considered a god. Seems more like an asexual budding with divine insemination/incubation.

[–]thanatosys 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not exactly, in Christian theology Jesus has always existed with God, his time on earth was just like a lil pit stop.

[–]Dazureus 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Existed with god mentally, physically, or spiritually? Did the Christian god exist alone then created an equal being that became Jesus? In a related question, is the holy spirit, the third part of the triumvirate, on equal footing or is god at the top with two lesser gods below him?

[–]thanatosys 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It is not exactly logical(what is in this realm?), the current tradition as I was taught is that they are the same being that operates in different aspects.

[–]AmbroseB 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm an atheist, but I went to a catholic school for 12 years.

What they believe is this, roughly; God has always existed in the same way. Jesus, God and the holy spirit are one god, but they all have different personalities, only not really. It's messed up.

This essentially means that Jesus was talking to himself, asking himself why he let himself down. Then when he died, he asked himself to forgive us for what we did to him, or something like that. It really makes no sense at all.

I still have no clue what the holy spirit is supposed to be, or how it's different from the others.

[–]miparasito 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And Perseus' mother. Divine rape FTW!

[–]saiyanate 83 points84 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You have hit upon yet another fundamental contradiction in Christian theology. Since Jesus knew he would ascend to Heaven, was it really a sacrifice to let himself be crucified?

[–]zorlan 85 points86 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah because the dying hurt. Not to mention he apparently rose from the dead as well, meaning that he personally didn't sacrifice anything as nothing was lost.

sacrifice - the surrender or destruction of something prized or desirable for the sake of something considered as having a higher or more pressing claim.

Jesus's life wasn't surrendered, nor destroyed, he rose and lived on then died (again) only to live on forever with God.

And since Jesus and God are one and the same, he essentially sacrificed himself to himself to save us from the sins he condemned us to make, to satisfy himself.

Makes perfect sense.

[–]CaptXtreme 17 points18 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And wasn't Jesus going around healing and teaching? Kind of a dick move to just piss off to heaven if he really was god, depriving the entire Earth and all her future generations the benefit of having this guy around.

[–]SashimiX 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But he lives in our hearts!!!1!!

He still perfoms miracles!!1

/s

[–]rub3s 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Can you hurt Jesus? What kind of physical pain does a man who has magical powers feel?

[–]zorlan 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The same as us, he was a mortal man, POOR JEBUS, PRAISE THE LORD, etc.

If I were Jesus, I'd have turned some of my body's water into wine. Being hammered during the crucifiction would have taken the edge off.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fuck wine, he could have been hopped up on enough morphine to kill a horse an no one at the time would have been able to tell.

[–]Zom_B 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Being hammered during the crucifiction would have taken the edge off of being nailed up.

FTFY (Finished that for you.)

[–]Zum_Horizont 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My former sect always explained it was that Jesus was disconnected from God, in the truest way that no one will experience until the big Heaven/Hell judgment at the end. Thus it was a huge sacrifice. Do I want to explain everything wrong with that? Not so much.

[–]alaithea 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Part of the reason it was considered a big price to pay was because Jesus was sinless. Humans were cursed to die because they sinned and are forevermore sinful. Jesus was not sinful, but died anyway. The logic is that since he was both God and man, and sinless to boot, his dying was enough to do away with the dying for all the rest of us awful, no-good low-lifes (low-lives? what's the plural of that?).

Way to start a religion on guilt-trips.

Also, the way Jesus got to be sinless is that sin is passed on in the Y-chromosome. Note that the Y-chromosome is a bit twisted and lopsided and ugly. (Um... nevermind how women get to be sinful despite lack of a Y chromosome. Shush! You're thinking too much.)

I am not making this up. Somebody else made it up and asked me to believe it when I was a kid.

[–]lief79 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Technically, according to Catholics the immaculate conception meant that Mary was conceived without sin too.

Which avoids this poor argument.

[–]menge101 20 points21 points ago* 

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While, I'm no believer. Getting crucified is a really shitty way to die. Probably only being killed by ants or rats or slowly lowered into acid is worse.

I mean you don't die from blood loss, from my understanding of it. You die because you dehydrate to death.

Edit: I have now learned of many worse ways to die. Thanks reddit!

[–]thanatosys 43 points44 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But it was hardly unique, hell there were supposedly 2 other dudes getting crossed at the same time...

[–]n0t_5hure 57 points58 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

double-crossed?

[–]thanatosys 25 points26 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

*puts on sunglasses.

[–]thanatosys 21 points22 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

YEAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!

[–]josephsh 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

you guys did not do this right.

[–]thanatosys 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Cant blame me for trying.

[–]JCY2K 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But you can blame you for not using an apostrophe; the key is right there.

[–]josephsh 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I guess you can say...

puts on sunglasses

...you tried.

[–]BenHuge 19 points20 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It actually wasn't unique in anyway. I'm not a Christian or anything, but I do know history and TONS of people were crucified.

[–]joeldavis 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'll just mention spartacus here (not him, but a lot of the people who "followed" him.)

[–]Pedgi 21 points22 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Nero once lit his garden by having it lined with crucified Christians and lighting them on fire.

[–]Gudeldar 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

IIRC even the pagans thought that was kind of cruel and excessive.

[–]gathly 3 points4 points ago* 

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You got to love that Nero. He also woke the entire senate to assemble for emergency meetings in the middle of the night, so he could tell them the different ways he could kill them all.

[–]zdkm 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While most of the rebel slaves had been killed on the battlefield, some 6,000 survivors had been captured by the legions of Crassus. All 6,000 were crucified along the Appian Way from Rome to Capua.[52]

Ouch

[–]thanatosys 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I have to wonder if they assembly lined it, you know one goes up one goes down; or if they actually made 6,000 crosses.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Guy with clipboard: Crucifiction?

"uh-huh"

"out the door, line on the left, one cross each"

"Next!"

[–]zip_000 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I always thought there was probably a long line of them, but not 6000 at once.

[–]Pedgi 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That would've been a pretty strong message, eh? Traveling along the road and seeing all of these people who resisted Rome's rule, slowly dying.

[–]MRRoberts 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In the movie, Spartacus is crucified last, so he is outside the gates of Rome and he has to watch/help everyone else be crucified.

[–]mutatron 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It was 6000 crosses spaced more or less evenly every 150 feet or so. Crassus' point was to make a display to all who would rebel against the power of Rome.

[–]visualtim 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I play Rome: Total War, so I was extra amazed that not only did I know where Capua was, but that it was prety far from Rome if you're lining the way with crucifixes.

[–]ooopsitbroke 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually you die by drowning. Typically the omans would tie your arms to a cross and your legs would be bent then tied. The result is that you can ether hang from the cross, and not exhale fully. Or you could push your legs up from the squatting postion. To make it more fun after ther fisrt day your legs would be broken. It was a painful death over several days

[–]titaniumjackal 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hahaha. I misread your oman typo as "onan." And it totally made sense that Onanists would drown their victims. =)

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think there were various saints that suffered deaths that were, in my opinion, worse than crucifixion. Saint Bartholomew was skinned alive, for instance.

[–]novagenesis 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Half the stuff the Catholics did in the inquisition make Crucifixion sound like a dream.

I particularly love the one where they lock you in a metal box (hot as hell during the day, cold at night) and slip you food enough to live...then shrink the box (with a vice-like mechanism) an inch or so each day until you die in about a month...

But Jesus, you know, suffered more than that :)

[–]sleepyj910 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

and yet, he was God, so could have escaped if he wanted.

[–]aideity 24 points25 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Or how do you know He really suffered? Being a god he could as well faked it all and just enjoyed the ride.

[–]RobotBuddha 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I used to work at a hospital and lived next to two old folks homes. Seriously, getting crucified sucks but it's not even close to the worst way to die. It's actually pretty nice compared to a lot. Try dying from cancer, now that's shit. Or even me. In theory I've got something like fifty or sixty YEARS of agony left. While any one moment isn't as bad as crucifixian, I have no question that I'd choose that over my current "life" if it meant even a year or two more of just existing with no pain.

I think it only works as a "horrible death" if you haven't been around many people dying a painful death, or if you're indoctrinated into thinking of it that way.

[–]OatsNboats 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think the sacrifice is in having made the move from heaven to earth, to then be crucified. It is not necessarily that he knew he would ascend to heaven, so much as he knew there would be suffering in deciding to come to earth for crucifixion (my first instinct was to spell that crucifiction). The motive doesn't make the story any less of a bull shit story.

[–]jeffp12 22 points23 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He died for your sins...except he came back to life three days later, and then ascended bodily into heaven. So Jesus died for your sins, but is still alive. It sounds like this was written by the guys that made Lost. I'm waiting for the smoke monster.

Besides, how can death be a major sacrifice in the first place? All human beings die, he just did something that all human beings do, but then he didn't stay dead. When my grandma died, she fucking stayed dead, so do I get absolved of at least a parking ticket for that?

So I've thought about what could be a great sacrifice, and here is what I came up with: Jesus is hanging on the cross, on the verge of death. God and Satan appear before him. God says that he can come with him to heaven, and live in blissful peace for all eternity, but humans will not be forgiven. Satan says that he can come with him to hell, and live in eternal torture and hellfire, and for this all humanity's sins will be forgiven. If Jesus were to choose to go with Satan, and spend every morning sucking Satan's massive scaley cock, getting raped by demons that fuck him where there aren't orifices, and thrown into pits of lava to cauterize those wounds shut, only to repeat this again and again for all eternity...then maybe I would consider that a sacrifice.

"Jesus died for your sins" doesn't have much of a ring to it. Billions of people have died, they don't count because they stay dead? But "Jesus swallowed for your sins." that's a fuckin sacrifice. You think cum in the eye stings? Try cum in the crown of thorn wounds.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points ago* 

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, even when I was 10 and still went to church I always thought that the whole thing would make WAY more sense if Jesus had to spend eternity in Hell. It doesn't make ANY sense that he gets to live, and in Heaven. Just dying isn't much of a sacrifice, everyone dies.

And plenty of people have died more gruesome deaths than his was alleged to be. So it's even less impressive.

[–]jeffp12 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, he wasn't even the only guy being crucified right then. And he died within only a few hours, unlike the 3 days or so it usually takes. This according to the gospels. I don't believe jesus was a real person.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think there might have been a dude that claimed to be the Jewish Messiah, that pissed off the Romans enough to have him killed. But that's about it.

Paul is the lynch-pin. He founded the religion, and probably had a lot to do with the Jesus story.

[–]Myotis 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Forget Jesus. What is up with this Holy Spirit guy? He doesn't do much but is always mentioned.
I always imagined the holy spirit to reflect this guy. I wouldn't be surprised if he was pulling the strings the whole time.

[–]SarcasticDouchebag 17 points18 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Finally! a crack in the otherwise flawless logic that is Christianity!

[–]rosconotorigina 41 points42 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I always thought, if someone said I could go through great pain for a few days, but then I'd be perfectly happy forever and everybody else would have the opportunity to be perfectly happy forever that would hardly be a sacrifice. I'd have to be either a fool or an asshole to say no.

[–]nicksauce 42 points43 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not only perfectly happy forever, but also overlord of the fucking universe. Seems like a damn good deal to me.

[–]JCY2K 16 points17 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I once heard it described as 'Jesus had a bad weekend for our sins.' (Julia Sweeney)

[–]zip_000 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's like going on a reality show!

[–]ENRICOs 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not. In essence God sacrificed himself to himself for himself....something like that.

[–]cmotdibbler 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ahhh.. the Carlin edition of the bible.

[–]zipfe 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Throw in a couple of 'fucking' for even more authenticity.

[–]cmotdibbler 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

and Joe Pesci!

[–]enlashok 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's actually not wildly different to any of the other versions.

[–]JumpinJehosephat 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You just don't get the simple believable truth: God decided to knock up some Palestinian virgin who'd give birth to his son and who'd sacrifice his own life for mankind but who'd turn out to be God himself after all. What's so hard to understand?

[–]Garage_Dragon 14 points15 points ago* 

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The thing I don't get is how Jesus died a pretty gruesome death for everyone on earth. That's pretty cool, I guess. I've never really understood how a crucifixion is tied to someone else's sins, but whatever. Assume for the sake of argument that's exactly how it went down.

If that is true, then wouldn't a soldier jumping on a grenade to save his squad be many times nobler a sacrifice? I mean, it's one thing to give your life to save a billion people, but it's far greater to give your life to save five others.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But Jesus was perfect and without sin. The rest of us deserve whatever we get apparently.

[–]RobotBuddha 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Which is even odder given that Jesus apparently made us, and we sin. Isn't creating something that you know will commit a sin itself a sin?

[–]toobias 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for a friend.

[–]Terrorpede 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Jumping on a grenade gets you a medal of honor, next best thing really.

[–]Garage_Dragon 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Maybe we should give Jesus a posthumous medal of honor.

[–]ManIs5 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Why didn't Frodo just have one of the giant eagles fly him to Mordor?

Dramatic tension.

[–]jefuchs 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I say that all the time!!! Not only did he suffer for what... three days? He gets credit up the wazoo over people who suffer for decades. Not only that, he is guaranteed to go to heaven, no matter what. Shit, he's got his own set of keys. But people who really suffer still have to face the uncertainty of heaven or hell.

If god sacrificed his son for us, then why can't christians demand a full refund of their tithe money, and still claim to have sacrificed their cash? God didn't lose a thing in the deal. It's such a scam.

[–]Stick 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

God inconvenienced his only begotten son.

[–]ExtraGravy 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you die then you will resurrect and be a supreme being with unimaginable powers for all time... hmmm... what a sacrifice! I would choose short term pain for long term gain in this proportion every time. Most humans would.

[–]GrandKittah 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

When Jesus died on earth, he went to hell, and spent a couple of days there. The idea of hell is lesser so burny fire, but the absence of God.

The idea is that Jesus was free of sin, and did not deserve to go to hell.

Why hath thou forsaken me. = God leaving Jesus, and temporarily condemning him to hell.

He went to hell because he took the sins of all mankind upon himself.

God punishes, and judges based on motive, if Jesus never sinned nor had impure motives, then he did not deserve to be punished.

-Via a very christian upbringing.

[–]newdog33 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It dosn't make sense, it's not supposed to. It's ment to confuse you, to scare you, to get you to obey the masters. Religion is the original conspiracy. That's my theory. It's fucked up crazy shit for fucked up crazy people. Free yourself.

[–]ddixonr 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"It's not the ultimate sacrifice if he didn't stay dead"

[–]acteon29 4 points5 points ago* 

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The sacrifice would have been to come to our shitty earth.

The moral of christianity is more or less the following one:

1º) A god sent us his only son.

2º) As a welcome, we kill his son the worst manner. [facepalm]

3º) Despite having killed his ONLY SON, that powerful god still loves us. In other words: that love from that god to us must be REALLY BIG.

4º) THIS is how humans should love each other (as much as to keep loving others even if they killed you your only son)

Christianity is just an invented exemplifying or illustrating tale about how much should people love each other. It's a society-preserving folklore.

So the thing is not the height of reflections like yours (your reflection is not grasping what christianity really is).

[–]arnedh 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What's more: Judas was the bigger guy.

Jesus got the torture, and then a place at God's side in Heaven - as decided by God.

Judas had to sin, be ostracized by his peers, hang himself and spend eternity in Hell - as decided by God.

[–]monoglot 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Jorge Luis Borges wrote a terrific short story in the form of a dense scholarly article about this idea, Three Versions of Judas.

[–]arnedh 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yup.

Borges, the man.

[–]macrumpton 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If Xtians really believed in heaven then every funeral would be a celebration like you have for somebody who got an awesome promotion.

[–]iorgfeflkd 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Pretty much no aspect of that story makes sense.

[–]MpVpRb 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a silly old legend from long ago.

The whole book is nothing but nonsense.

[–]cynoclast 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Any time you try to analyze any religion using logic it falls right the fuck apart.

None of them stand up to mere rationality.

[–]jindjur 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The logic is flawed to be sure. My understanding from this aspect of the Jesus story is to convince people it's ok to be afraid of death. Even god - when made into a human who knows he will go back to heaven - is scared of dying. Why this is important is only to relate to god on a personal level and feel more "god-like" despite one's mortal fears.

The sacrifice is said to be him having to experience the agony of torture and murder at the hands of vindictive assholes who believed they were acting according to the law. Teaching lessons right up to the end...

Which is all very nice but meaningless since it's a story concocted to persuade other pagans to join Paul's messianic cult. What's more fascinating that it works. It relates to a large swath of the population on a visceral level: People feel like gods with the control over their own decisions but are conflicted by the frustrations of powers beyond their control in the world at large.

Tap into that negative psychology, paint a convincing picture of how to overcome and congrats, you've just built a better mouse-trap.

[–]djkalteraphine 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How is it a sacrifice? Because the Bible says it's a sacrifice.

Friends, you'll be a lot happier when you stop trying to use logic when dealing with people to live in lala land.

[–]Crazycatlover 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Good question. It reminds me of CCD (Catholic Sunday School) growing up. Our teacher asked us something along the lines of "Would any of you be willing to sacrifice yourself for all of humanity?" I was seven and thought she wanted an honest answer so I said I thought I would. I got in so much trouble especially when I got half the class saying that it was for all of humanity, they probably would die a painful death. The question was supposed to just make us all feel bad about ourselves.

Also, Christains will probably point out that Jesus was in heaven before he came to earth and that he went to hell for...three whole days!

Finally, why couldn't God just forgive? I thought that was supposed to be his current forte.

[–]bonekeeper 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It Jesus was such a nice guy, why did he go to hell, even if for only 3 days ?

[–]teresamack 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Looking for consistency in the Bible is like looking for virgins in a brothel.

Seriously though, no ONE person wrote the Bible. If you think about it, it's only a collection of literature from different authors. The church (and Christians in general) tries to make it all fit into one ideology but for an objective, rational thinker that's just not a plausible feat. Putting aside the MULTITUDE of evidence that proves the Bible is nothing more than a story and cannot be taken as fact, even if someone decided to sit down and read the Bible literally the book contains too many contradictions to clearly point someone in the right direction in regards to history, morality, ideology, etc.

[–]powercow 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

only guy i knwo to have his son killed and got his son back.

not much of a sacrifice for sure.

[–]kluenitou 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's religion. It's not supposed to make sense.

[–]Jawajoey 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's something I've never understood about the whole concept.

Another thing: If Jesus being crucified paid for EVERYONE'S sins, then how come no one else's earthly suffering counts for anything? Thousands of people got crucified, and countless more have suffered worse, but apparently only Jesus' suffering counts? humans can and did go through the exact same torture as Jesus, but that doesn't get them out of going hell?

[–]AgentLiquid 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people"

[–]Dazureus 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm not a believer, but I'm going to play one to further the conversation.

On the precognition of suffering and ascension: I don't think Jesus knew he was going to heaven. If I remember my attempted bible indoctrination properly, he had doubts in some garden the night before his arrest and crucifixion. He had doubt on the cross "why has thou forsaken me?". If I'm wrong, sorry, it has been a while. Remember, Jesus was still a mortal man. Death and pain was still scary stuff. Just because there's the expectation of reward, doesn't make the extreme pain of crucifixion and death all the more inviting. Would you still want untold monetary wealth for you and your generations to come if it meant cutting off both legs with a blunt spoon?

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]Furious00 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ah but this is the problem with the crucifixion narratives. In Mark, Jesus is a very human and approachable guy. You can sympathize with him. This is the most probable account of what happened. It's not till you go out a few decades and no doubt countless revisions that you get the ethereal Jesus who no longer rebukes God but claims, "it is done."

Jesus became a legend. His legend grew and it's completely obvious if you read the gospels in the order Mark, Matthew/Luke, John.

[–]waynemr 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

At a more fundamental level, if God is omnipotent and already knows everything that has and will happen, why does he need anyone to actually make a choice? I mean, he already knows what they are going to pick, right? So, wasn't the whole killing Jesus thing and presenting the falsehood of free choice a really huge dick-move?

And, if the free choice really does exist and God doesn't know what people will pick, that means God is not omnipotent. So, what else did he mess up or get wrong, or not know?

[–]ClemsonPoker 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Welcome to the "Why an omnipotent God is incompatible with free will" portion of the program.

[–]IdyllicSilence 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think you're thinking of omniscience, not omnipotence. Omnipotence is only all-power, not all-knowledge.

/metaphysical nitpicking

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The use of "sacrifice" to mean "selflessly good deed that has a negative effect on the subject" is the metaphoric use of the word. It originally - and until recently, considering - meant "offering to god." The other uses of the word grew out of the "offering to god" definition, and not vice versa. This wasn't a sacrifice in the heroic sense, or the noble sense, but as written it was sacrifice in the "offering to god" sense because that's what sacrifice means.

Now, the fact that he offered himself to himself (or his son to himself) is equally as odd. But your statement is simply incorrect.

[–]strained_brain 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is that why Jesus is often called a "lamb?" Lambs were sacrificial offerings...

[–]sharked 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If Jesus had been sacrificed by getting thrown into hot lava, would Xtians be wearing Volcanos around their neck? hmmmmm....

[–]xmod2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I may have more compassion if rather than dying after 3 days at 30, he lived to his 70s slowly dying of cancer.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Some part of every Christian's brain realizes religion is a crock and there is no sky cake. That's why the death of a savior is a compelling story, because Christians don't really believe in sky cake, so a worldly death carries great weight with them.

There is a difference between believing and wanting to believe. Christians want to believe in fairy tales, but very few are so delusional that they rejoice when humans die, but rejoice is what they should do if they truly believe. There would be no sadness. There would only be joy in death.

Christians rationalize the discrepancy by saying they're sad because they miss the deceased person in their worldly life, but that's just one more lie they've been told and willingly accepted in order to keep the fairy tale alive.

[–]gathly 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, according to medieval nutjobs like Mel Gibson, it was a very painful afternoon before he got into heaven.

[–]Defektiv 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Because supposedly he had to suffer through hell to get there. But there's supposed to be no escape from hell. So there is really, but only if you're the son of God's who is actually himself. And all the winners of the spiritual lottery will be equal to God when its all over so someone throw the rest of us a fireproof rope.

[–]Lameretardant 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It would only make sense if Jesus was now burning in hell for my sins.

[–]wickedcold 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Living forever on earth to teach us how to get into heaven, while never being able to himself, now THAT would be a sacrifice.

[–]oohay_email2004 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Plus, it's immoral to think that by the torture and death of another person your personal responsibilities can be removed from you. See Christopher Hitchens for this argument.

[–]RobotBuddha 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In Julia Sweeny's excellent story of her walk into atheism, she talks about her brothers painful struggle with cancer. And compares the years of agony he went through with Jesus, who had "a really bad weekend for our sins".

Which is pretty much how I look at it as well. There's just no contest between a lot of cancers and crucifixian. Especially when you consider Jesus had super powers. He was a fucking rock star with every benefit during his life. Forget heaven, that kind of death is worth it just to be able to change water to wine.

[–]novagenesis 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The "had to die" part is hard to understand, but technically Jesus went to Hell. That was his sacrifice.

Of course, is it really a sacrifice to be locked up if you hold all the keys?

[–]mattar 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

also god and jesus are supposed to be the same thing, so try to figure that one one out.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

...wow, that's fucking weird. I just watched Igby Goes Down last night and he said the same fucking thing. @_@

[–]esoteric_enigma 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not a sacrifice. I got in an argument with my Sunday school teacher about this when I was 10. I was like it's not a big deal that he died on the cross since if he was the son of god he knew 100% that he was going to heaven. I was like the true heroes are all the people who sacrifice on earth that could never be certain that a heaven exists or that they would be going there if it did.

[–]epiyoo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

because being on earth to do God's good work is the best thing a human can experience, but don't be scared of dying because heaven is actually way better than earth. DUH

And don't ask me why that makes sense because, it goes without saying, circular logic is circular logic is circular.

[–]zd91 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

God didn't give his only son just as much as Harry Potter didn't walk through the wall at a train station. They're stories, people just struggle to grasp that somehow.

[–]mapoftasmania 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If Jesus was God's son, then God wins a Darwin Award for removing him from the gene pool before he could breed.

[–]efrique 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He was back on earth a few days later, so how was the "leaving earth" part even a sacrifice?

And was was he saving us from, anyway? From god's punishment.

So god sacrifices his son, which is actually himself, for a few days to save us from himself.

Jesus spent a shitty weekend to save us all, went to a better place, came back and then ended up in the better place again. To save us from the punishment of god, which is himself. For which we're supposed to be extremely thankful, and if we're not, well, it's eternal fires for us.

Yay!

[–]noseham 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It was just a huge publicity stunt, anyways. Dying on the cross MADE Jesus, and he didn't even have the commitment to stay dead! Pfff...

[–]satereader 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Beats me. How could the life or death of a human form in any way be significant to an all-powerful creator of the cosmos?

[–]HedonistRex 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

FYI: Jesus (according to Christianity) went to Hell, not Heaven, between his death and resurrection.