this post was submitted on
9 points (100% like it)
9 up votes 0 down votes
all 12 comments

[–]Wolke 2 points3 points ago

I don't know about econ specifically, but I've had bio friends in undergrad who were on track to be the last author in papers to be published in major journals. I feel your professor is right to suggest that you try though - the worst that could happen is that they reject you, which doesn't change anything. Going through the publishing process would also be helpful if you intend to stay in research. Let the journal worry about whether or not they want to publish undergrad research - you just go ahead and give it a shot.

[–]DouggyD 1 point2 points ago

Melissa Dell published her MA thesis in econometrica. If the work is good, no one cares. Just saying B journal is pretty terrible advice though. There are second tier general interest journals like ReStat and then top field journals, and then obviously second tier field journals, any of which I could see as counting as a B journal. But the papers they accept are very different.

What's the punchline, and general methodology?

[–]SantyClause[S] 1 point2 points ago*

Well he gave me a particular journal to send it to.

It's a pure theory paper. Its a Cournot model (game theory/industrial organization) that exhibits instability for any more than 2 players. From the literature, the only other Cournot models that do this were essentially unrealistic for a variety of reasons, but I show that my model does not have any of those problems.

There is also a bit of dynamics involved including bifurcations and even chaos.

[–]DouggyD 2 points3 points ago

Oh well if he gave you a particular journal, that's great. You should definitely go ahead and do it. Again, the journals couldn't care less who you are (to an extent). They'll judge the work on its own merit and you'll be judged the same way anyone else is, except superstars, who obviously get special treatment.

Also, I just want to mention: don't feel bad if it gets rejected, it's all part of it. If you aren't getting some rejections, you're doing something wrong. Top researchers in top departments get rejections all the time. Your optimal strategy is to push the envelope in terms of where you can publish, so if you aren't getting some rejections, you're not being agressive enough. So, if it gets rejected, just read over the referee reports carefully, do your best to address the concerns, and re-submit to a journal one rung lower on the ladder.

If your professor thinks it's publishable and he isn't a moron, it almost definitely is (even if not in the journal he recommended). It's always a toss up because referees can be idiots, but just be persistent, it will pay off, I promise. A single authored paper in a 2nd/3rd tier journal is extremely impressive for an undergrad.

Good luck!

[–]boraca 2 points3 points ago

My friend submitted an article (Computer Science related, but that's not the point) to a journal and while they didn't publish it, they read it and gave him almost 20 pages of comments on his work including style tips (English wasn't his first language, but now you could say it is) and specific sentences he should avoid (it wasn't a copy pasted submission guide, they've put some man-hours into it), e.g. he had a habit of asking questions in the text like 'But why is that?' and it's frowned upon in a scientific text. In my University there's a contest twice a year where students write articles and make presentations of them before a committee and the best article in each category (there are 18 of them) gets published in a journal. In Poland if you want a government scholarship on top of the one granted by university you actually need to publish at least once a year. So yes, journals consider publishing even from first year students, it's encouraged and in some countries it's almost impossible to start a doctoral program without publishing while being an undergrad.

[–]BehemothTheCat 0 points1 point ago

B journals will do it, if your results are interesting, you definitely have a chance (Or A journals if the results are really good...). So if your prof recommends it go for it, it really can't hurt. Or, you can look for a co-author that's established if you'd really like to get it published.

[–]DouggyD 1 point2 points ago

I'm not sure this is great advice. A singled author paper carries much more weight. If (s)he had a single authored paper in a 10-15 ranked journal, (s)he would legitimately have a chance at Harvard or MIT grad school. A co-authored paper in a similar journal wouldn't do it, especially if it was with a really established person - people would assume the student was a glorified RA on the project. Also, unless the co-author is extremely well published it won't make a difference with the journal.

The thing is, no journal will go easy with a paper because the person is in undergrad. The bar is set to the same level as someone with a doctorate. But at the same time, they would never reject a good paper just because the person in in undergrad.

If the prof thinks it's publishable in a decent field journal and it's already single authored, keep it single authored. Never give up co-authorship unless it's SIGNIFICANTLY improving the paper - especially early in a career.

[–]economicurtis 0 points1 point ago

As a solo authors, your odds are pretty slim for a number of reasons. Perhaps partner up with the adviser and seek to be first author. An undergrad in my program published (with two professor co-authors) in JET (a close to top journal). He did a a fair amount of the work. Definitely a wise route to a good grad program.

[–]nietzschelover -1 points0 points ago

try undergrad journals

[–]arno-nyme 0 points1 point ago

worst advice! if undergrad work is very good, that it gets publish by a normal journal. but only in a non-undergrad journal it will get read.

[–]SantyClause[S] 0 points1 point ago

If I get rejected I'll probably do this.

[–]DouggyD 1 point2 points ago

Don't do this even if it gets rejected. Don't get under-agressive. Papers get rejected for the worst reasons, it doesn't mean it's a bad paper. Honestly, some referees skim the paper, don't understand it because they didn't read it carefully, then reject it because they didn't understand it.

If it gets rejected go back to your professor, and ask his advice. If he thinks it's publishable in a real journal, publish it in a real journal. Don't be shy with the prof. If he's telling you to publish it, he thinks it's fantastic, and no prof is ever annoyed by helping students who do fantastic work. He'll be more than happy to help you through the whole process. Definitely keep him up to date, he'll appreciate it (also - think future reference letter. The more initiative you show, and the more interaction with him the better your career will be).