use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g.reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
Love is all about chemistry... (self.TwoXChromosomes)
submitted 1 year ago by xejTep
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_basis_for_love
I have to say I am a bit disappointed. There is no "higher power" that makes two people fall in love, there is no such thing as spiritual forces that pull us together.
Its all down to chemical reactions and hormones. So boring! :(
[–][deleted] 43 points44 points45 points 1 year ago
Knowing how to make a cookie and what goes into it doesn't make it any less delicious! :)
[–]BoxyBoxster 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
Very Taoist of you, I'm overwhelmed by the profound but simple wisdom
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
:D
It's actually not mine; I read it somewhere a while ago.
[–]Treees 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
What if you found out your favorite cookies were made with unfertilized chicken embryos?
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
I'm also concerned about dihydrogen monoxide in my pipes.
[–]tintinnabulant 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Om nom nomelette.
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 1 year ago*
I see it exactly the other way round. It find it incredibly fascinating.
[–]MayaKarin 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago
exactly! It isn't the whim of some crazy bearded fellow that makes you right or wrong for someone else - it's intrinsically inside of you. I think it's wonderful!
[–]runamok 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Unweaving the rainbow reveals even more beauty and doesn't make life any less amazing.
[–]throwaway4227 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
It also makes it easier to get over relationships.
[–]psychminor01 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
What's really cool is scientists can put you in a certain situation and inject you with some chemical (like adrenaline) and ask you what emotion you're feeling. While varying the situation and keeping the chemical the same, people report different feelings. So the same physiological reaction could be identified as fear, excitement, infatuation, etc; depending on the scenario.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
So we COULD be in the matrix like... right now?
Bye, gonna bend spoons.
That is really cool. So I guess it depends on the interpretation!
[–]psychminor01 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Follow up. I had a psych teacher who was lecturing about this and he told us a story.
He was taking a girl on a first date and things were going just so-so. They went to dinner and a movie; then decided to get some coffee on their walk back to the dorms. She said to make sure it was decaffeinated because caffeine really messes with her. He said sure, and went and got the coffee. Well, on the walk back she was really starting to warm up to him! She even commented that she usually didn't feel that way on a first date. He was surprised to get a second date as well. It wasn't until later that he noticed he was drinking the decaffeinated coffee, and she had gotten the regular.
That's hilarious! I guess it did mess with her.
[–]victory3108 11 points12 points13 points 1 year ago
you should know, not all science is correct conclusive or complete. I'm a biologist and the realization that science is often wrong initially blew my mind but it happens all the time. This article also doesn't explain why people fall in love with each other, only what happens when they do.
This 100x.
Shit is constantly being proven wrong by new evidence or new theories. Just because the latest theory proved something to be a certain way doesn't mean that it is the truth. Science is more a way to find understanding rather than a way of determining truths.
[–]katethefabulous 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
yep. Science is always being redefined. Doctors used to think that a womans uterus would literally atrophie if they went to college.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
That's absurd! I feel like it might have been a "study" to keep women from going to college.
[–]Salif[] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
No science is conclusive or complete, not physics or mathematics which are the most concrete. Especially not biology, which is one of the most "fuzzy" sciences. (I'm not saying this to be insulting, its just true, its incredibly difficult to have a thorough and fundamental knowledge in such a varied field with an unending number of variables) We don't even know why Tylenol works :P
[–]chem_vixen 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Depends on your perspective. As a chemist IRL, I really think the chemistry behind falling/being in love is very interesting and intriguing. One of the things I find most interesting is the subliminal role that smell plays in being attracted to someone. I learned about it not too long ago and it's just interesting because it just goes to show how these things happen and we aren't even aware of it.
[–]Rhode 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
There's no such thing as fate. Love is all about the way two people treat each other, their decisions in life and the commitment they make to each other. Their is no authority higher than the person you choose to spend your life with, and we each create our own destiny in making that choice. Chemical reactions and hormones might explain why we love, but it does not dictate who or how. We decide for ourselves who we share our lives with.
Each of us enjoys free will, the ability to build a future of our own choosing. Destiny and free will are mutually exclusive, why would anyone want to be a slave to fate?
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Your post is very eloquent, but I think a lot of studies have shown that science can explain some factors that go into why we choose who we do. For example, you fall in love with people who are like your parents, the pheromone theory, the matching hypothesis of psychology, etc.
[–]DOGA 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
For example, you fall in love with people who are like your parents
Oh fucking hell no. Which studies mentioned this?
Hmmm I read about it a while ago but here's a link to something similar.
I haven't really found it to be true.
[–]dogboat 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
I remember reading that if a woman had a good relationship with her father she'd try to find a guy similar. The same was not true if they had a bad or distant relationship, though. That made me feel better.
Don't remember the study or how accurate it was, though.
[–]Rhode -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
Those things explain attraction, but commitment is a conscious decision. Yes, human psychology is incredibly complex and of course we can't control biological processes, but to say that we're not in control of our relationships is foolish, in my opinion. Chalking human behavior up to biology is counter-productive anyway. Yes, we're just animals and some of our behavior is deeply ingrained in our psyche, but we're also human beings and we fully possess the ability to rise above our programming and be accountable for our actions.
You're right, science can explain some of the factors that contribute to who we find attractive, but the course of a relationship between two people is decided by the choices they make and how they treat each other.
Alright, that makes sense. I thought you were saying you choose who you are attracted to.
Does our capacity for free thought free us from fate? Or is even that predetermined?
Does having biological limitations mean that we are fated for something?
[–]Rhode 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I don't think we're fated for anything. Maybe there are statistical likelihoods and probable outcomes, but nothing is certain. I mean, I suppose we're all fated to search for food and shelter, and we're all destined to die in some way, but that's not really what we're talking about here.
Plus, isn't the question kind of irrelevant anyway? What if things are predetermined, what then? Do we just stop trying because the outcome is already decided? Are our limitations so significant that we we're doomed to just endlessly repeat the same mistakes as our parents, and their parents, and all our ancestors stretching back through antiquity? Are we just actors on a stage, forever playing out the same tired roles? That whole line of thinking is a prison. It's mental slavery, it's defeatism. Walk that path and you'll find no answers, only comfortable fairy tales about mystical forces guiding helpless people through their troubles. To believe in fate is impotence.
I am a living, breathing, sentient human being and I am free to interact with my environment and affect change within it. I possess self-awareness, and that awareness allows me to recognize the limitations of human behavior and rise above them. I am not helpless, I am empowered. I am not repeating the mistakes my parents made, I am learning from them. Because of those lessons, I'm not only growing on a personal level, but I am also part of the living, real-time evolution of our species. By participating in that evolution, we are affecting the biological limitations of our descendants, in the same way that our ancestors affected our limitations. The bottom line is simple: Our decisions matter, our legacies are real, and the future belongs to us, not us to it.
link
[–]morris198 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
There's a great little conversation on the topic in the graphic novel, Y - The Last Man between the titular character Yorick and two women -- a scientist and an agent.
Scientist: "[Your monkey] isn't capable of love, Yorick. Trust me, after years of working with those things, I can assure you that capuchin [monkeys] are no different than other animals. All they care about is eating, screwing and sleeping."
Agent: "Huh, somebody never got a puppy when she was little."
Scientist: "My dog's name was Mister Doug, thank you very much. But I never mistook his 'loyalty' as anything other than old pack instincts."
Yorick: "So what, you think any motivations I ascribe to [my monkey] are just me imposing my emotions on him?"
Scientist: "Love isn't an 'emotion,' it's an abstract construct mammals assign to a biological imperative they don't fully understand. You're not pretending your monkey is like you... You're pretending you're not like your monkey."
[–]Salif[] 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Its mostly our intelligence/personality that drives who we are attracted to and why, for an almost incalculable number of chaotic reasons. I think its part of the amazing life that we are so fortunate to have, for whatever reasons. A "higher power" causing people to be together with an incredible failure rate is uninteresting and depressing. But the fact that in all this chaos you can find someone who you connect with on many levels in a deep and profound way, that's truly romantic, that's an ideal worth chasing.
I find it interesting, but I still believe souls have something to do with it.
Eh. For some reason whenever I hear that there is an evolutionary basis to some theory I take it with a grain of salt. It's all the rage right now so people will definitely pay more attention to it, but that doesn't make it any more true than some other theory on love.
Science is not.... an exact science. (ho ho ho) If you come up with a theory you will find evidence to make it work, but the evidence could even support another theory. And theories are CONSTANTLY trumping previous ones so science is more of a constant flow of theories than THIS IS THE TRUTH kind of thing.
While it's fun to think that all our thought are just chemicals, can a few chemicals really create this kind of diversity in thought? Well, stripped of everything, yes, that is what they do but there is also your... you-ness.
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–][deleted] 43 points44 points45 points ago
[–]BoxyBoxster 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Treees 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]tintinnabulant 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points ago*
[–]MayaKarin 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]runamok 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]throwaway4227 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]psychminor01 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]psychminor01 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]victory3108 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]katethefabulous 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Salif[
] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]chem_vixen 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Rhode 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]DOGA 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]dogboat 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Rhode -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Rhode 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]morris198 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Salif[
] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago